Wikipedia:Peer review/Zilant/archive1

Please, list your reviews, if possible :) --Untifler 18:07, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting article. Some comments:

The page needs plenty of in-line citations to back up the various facts. (Particularly if you could give sources for the legends.) Otherwise the reader has no idea how much is true, or pure hoax.
Tatar and Turkic need to be linked.
Please fix the multiple errors in the sentence: "It should be noted, that another peoples, that live arround Kazan, such as Chuvashes and Mari also have legends, related to Kazan's foundation, but no one refers to Kazan dragon."
"After 16th century Russians loaned this legend from Tatars." Did you mean "acquired" this legend?
"Sceptics": Which skeptics are they? Is there a reference?

Thanks. — RJH 15:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The lead needs to be expanded, maybe fix the red links while you're at it. --Osbus 18:39, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]