Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Petraeus

Three good (IMO) images of David Petraeus; I was wondering if any of them stand up to standards.

His hand in option 2 is a bit blurred but apart from that, I think the rest of him is great. Muhammad(talk) 15:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The image of Petraeus walking through the market is superb, but the dynamic attention of the shot isn't on Petraeus; its on the other general and on the journalist. The technical quality of this image is high enough to be featured, but I don't think the encyclopedic value is. The press briefing shot isn't of high enough technical quality; there is obvious graininess even when displayed at about 1,000 pixels on the long side. In the Petraeus and Wallace shot, there are JPEG artifacts on Petraeus's eyes. If those artifacts were missing, this image might have a good shot. I wouldn't vote for it without the rest of the helmet to the left of the image because of personal opinions about composition, but it's just possible that this one would pass if you could find a version without the artifacts. - Enuja (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]