Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2015 June 8
| Entertainment desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < June 7 | << May | June | Jul >> | Current desk > |
| Welcome to the Wikipedia Entertainment Reference Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
June 8[edit]
It is possible to create some stalemate situation that is stalemate even without check-mate rules?[edit]
On chess, it is possible to create some stalemate situation that is stalemate even without check-mate rules?201.79.88.18 (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. The strict definition of "stalemate" in chess is that there are no valid moves that do not place the moving player in check -- discard the rules for being in check and you have discarded the notion of stalemate. A more expansive question, though, is whether you can set up a situation that forces a draw, as listed in the linked article. Cases that force a draw under standard circumstances will still force a draw without check rules in place -- your "no check" modification only serves to allow a player to place his King in a wider variety of positions that will lose on the opponent's next move, but it does not give the active player any new game-prolonging options. — Lomn 19:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- The OP might not be talking about ditching the rules of check, but excluding them. That is, the OP might be asking: Is there a stalemate that would still be stalemate even if it were legal for the king to move into a square that is in check? For example, imagine the king completely surrounded by pieces. In this situation, the king can't move at all, and so there might be a stalemate here that does not rely on the king not being able to move into check. 03:20, 14 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:D:5C01:ECB0:192B:704F:7D84:8494 (talk)
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 |       | 8 | |||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
Stalemate position, White to move
- Here's one (previously posted by me on Talk:Stalemate). Double sharp (talk) 12:40, 14 June 2015 (UTC)