Humanities desk
< December 16	<< Nov \| December \| Jan >>	December 18 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

December 17[edit]

List of government agencies by forbidden terms?[edit]

Is there a current list of government agencies restricted from using specific terms, alongside a list of those terms for each such agency? Ref.[1] Thanks! SciHaus (talk) 14:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously governments always have and make such lists and directives. Such directives are usually only for internal use and only get public attention when a "whistleblower" and the press make it public. Its nothing new but simply professional Public relations you find in any government. --Kharon (talk) 09:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone study and keep track of them? SciHaus (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It’s unlikely that anyone studies them... an agency itself might keep track internally, but any list the agency keeps would not be published for public dissemination. Blueboar (talk) 10:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In many countries, including the U.S., such lists are required by law to be published, are they not? I found Censorship_in_the_United_States#Political and scholarship on other countries at e.g., [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. SciHaus (talk) 13:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article says "The Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation’s top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases in official documents being prepared for next year’s budget." It doesn't say those words are prohibited totally - just in terms of begging the Congress for money. (This could be called right wing "political correctness".) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 11:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Columbus Globe for State and Industry Leaders[edit]

Where exactly is the lemma taken from? As there is no corresponding German article and I couldn't find any respective source for a German equivalent, I would be very grateful for any assistance considering the origin of the term used here.--Rogot (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking why it's called a "Columbus" globe? If this[6] is accurate, it sounds like it's a brand. And presumably named for Christopher Columbus. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 19:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article may be interesting. It seems that there was a Columbus factory / cartographer - presumably in Bavaria - which produced this (and a few more) globes. The firm was bombed in 1943 and its archives are lost. There does exist a manufacturer columbusglobus.de located in Ulm. As Bugs says, it is a trade name. --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but what about the "for State and Industry Leaders" (in capitals!). That seems to indicate it is the official [translated] name, though – as I already said – I didn't manage to find a corresponding source that supports this thesis.--Rogot (talk) 21:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Dutch Wikipedia article says that the original German name is Columbus Globus für staatliche und industrielle Führer. The relevant German Wikipedia article is de:Columbus_(Verlag)... -- AnonMoos (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]