Language desk
< October 6	<< Sep \| October \| Nov >>	October 8 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

October 7[edit]

Third[edit]

Does anyone know the reason third doesn't end in th?? Georgia guy (talk) 01:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean like first and second do? Here is the etymology of the word "third". --Jayron 32 01:34, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also §5.2.3, §5.2.11.1.--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 09:00, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

third < Old English þridda; fourth < Old English fēorþa. —Stephen (talk) 10:13, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a fair question because first and second are not derived from one and two (they literally mean more like 'leading' and 'following'), but third is derived from a cardinal number. —Tamfang (talk) 00:47, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First and third from Old English, second from Latin. As in primary, secondary, tertiary. Go figure. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 05:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't a reference for this, but I believe I've encountered an explanation that it is by dissimilation from the initial /θ/. A parallel case (height vs width, depth) is not susceptible to that explanation though, unless the feature '+continuant' on the initial segment is enough to trigger it (and then you'd need to explain why 'width' is exempt) --ColinFine (talk) 19:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In PIE there were no /θ/, and -dd- in the Old English word came from the intervocalic voicing of t in the suffix (compare Gothic þridja) and then the subsequent assimilation of d with j (this is why d became doubled, because j had to be compensated). In Middle English the word lost both the doubling and the final vowel (along with metathesis), hence the modern form.--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 00:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]