Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2013 March 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< March 30 << Feb | March | Apr >> April 1 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


March 31[edit]

Dx - xD = 1, why does this not commute?[edit]

This equation: Dx - xD = 1 from the differential operator article says its basic to quantum physics. Obviously there is no commutativity otherwise Dx=xD, but I don't understand why. Any explanation? I've taken calculus and I would like to know what specific things I need to learn in order to understand this equation. --Idontnodi (talk) 02:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To help others who wish to respond, here's a link to the relevant section of that article: Differential_operator#Properties_of_differential_operators. StuRat (talk) 02:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is really nothing more than the product rule in action. Apply both sides to a function f(x) and then use the product rule; hey presto. Looie496 (talk) 03:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How is that done? I do understand the product rule d(uv)=udv+vdu which is the notation I am accustom to. But I'm not familiar with the operator notation being used. Can someone rewrite this equation using Leibniz notation perhaps? Doesn't (d(y)/d(x)) x = x (d(y)/d(x))? I'm confused. --Idontnodi (talk) 03:42, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Using the notation in the article and apply to f(x). D(x f(x)) - x D(f(x))= (Dx) * f(x) + x D(f(x)) - x D(f(x)) = (Dx) * f(x) = 1 * f(x). Or in you notation d(x * f) - x*d(f) = d(x)*f + x*d(f) - x*d(f)=d(x)*f=1*f.--Salix (talk): 04:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
According to these equations: Dx = 1 and xD = 0. Correct? --Idontnodi (talk) 05:27, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They are both operators and need to be applied to a function. , where ? is replaced by some function. They don't have any particular value until the function is specified. If you apply them to the constant function 1 , . --Salix (talk): 05:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Idontnodi (talk) 08:03, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Here's amother couple of operators to show how something like that can work. With , you can see that . We could write that as . In the original the 1 was the identity operator rather than producing the constant 1 when applied to any function. Dmcq (talk) 11:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not having ever used operators such as these, I almost wasted my time with that one. Thanks again!! --Idontnodi (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is perhaps what Dmcq is trying to say.

With , you can see that .

Bo Jacoby (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]