Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2016 May 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< April 30 << Apr | May | Jun >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


May 1[edit]

Pythagorous theorem[edit]

How did Pythagorous find out very accurately that h^2=p^2+b^2 ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahil shrestha (talkcontribs) 02:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sahil shrestha: Hello. Please have a look at the article on the Pythagorean theorem, which details several early proofs.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Related question: How do I get the animated SVG at Pythagorean theorem#Pythagorean_proof to animate? -- SGBailey (talk) 08:28, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Have you clicked through repeatedly to get the SVG animation itself ( https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/Pythagoras-proof-anim.svg ) and not the PNG previews? -- ToE 12:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - nothing happens. -- SGBailey (talk) 20:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The triangles slide for me in three different browsers when I click again. Does the animation rely on Java? Dbfirs 21:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neither Java nor (what Db probably means) JavaScript is needed, because I don't normally enable those in Firefox and I saw it. Firefox does have a setting* as to whether animations will repeat, play just once, or not play at all; I have it set to play just once, and that's what I saw. (*In about:config, you change the value of image.animation_mode—on Linux you do this by right-clicking on it. The value none is for no animation, once is for once, and the default is to repeat. Once upon a time this used to be settable through a dialog box but I don't think it is any more.) --69.159.61.172 (talk) 04:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It works in Firefox but not IE. Anyway I've seen it now, so thanks folk. -- SGBailey (talk) 11:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]