Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2018 April 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< April 6 << Mar | April | May >> April 8 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


April 7[edit]

Name for ellipse-like shape that resembles a dumb-bell[edit]

Hi, I'm looking for the name of a curve (and its mathematical parameterization) that amounts to a generalization of the ellipse -- one that is pinched a bit along the minor axis so that it can resemble a dumb-bell. Thanks. Attic Salt (talk) 17:40, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Attic Salt: Do you possibly mean the Cassini oval...? --CiaPan (talk) 18:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That will do very nicely. Thank you. Attic Salt (talk) 18:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Cassini ovals are not "a generalization of the ellipse", though: that is, no Cassini oval is an ellipse. —Tamfang (talk) 01:43, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you. Attic Salt (talk) 19:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a constant?[edit]

Is there a constant that can make this relation ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.98.231.36 (talk) 19:17, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're asking exactly, but depending on the value of c, your equation may have 0, 1, or 2 (real) solutions. In general, I think you can solve for x in terms of the Lambert W function. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
He's asking for a constant c such that , i.e. a fixed point of the exponential function with base c. First off, the only c that satisfies this for all x is 1. Secondly, the exponential function for real x is always positive, so only positive x can be fixed points. There is only one value of c such that there is only one fixed point and it satisfies both and (as the graph of the exponential function there is tangent to the graph of the identity function), from which we conclude that , , . Fixed point iteration of the latter equation yields from which we recover . This looks uncanningly close to the value of e so I conjecture that and . For any c below this we have two solutions.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
By inspection of the curves, we can see that has either 0, 1 or 2 solutions, depending on the value of . As Jasper notes, the case where there is exactly 1 solution corresponds to the case where is tangent to . That is . So . It's easy to see that Jasper's conjectured values for and satisfy this, proving Jasper's conjecture. RomanSpa (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jasper: I think your sentence starting "First off..." is false and should be deleted: in general is not equal to . RomanSpa (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Brain fart. --Jasper Deng (talk) 07:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]