Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2021 July 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematics desk
< July 16 << Jun | July | Aug >> Current desk >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


July 17[edit]

Decomposition of convex combination[edit]

Please let me know if this is inappropriate. I don't know how to type TeX in wiki. So maybe it is better to paste the link of my question here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4198466/is-this-decomposition-of-convex-combination-always-feasible Thank you very much!

Quotient problem[edit]

The square root of (a*b), divided by (a+b), equals 0.5 if and only if a=b. In any other case, the quotient is less than 0.5. I've established this experimentally, but I can't see why it's the case. I've only considered positive a and b, but what about negative a and/or b? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 02:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's the inequality of arithmetic and geometric means. --116.86.4.41 (talk) 04:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. Thanks. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 08:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If either a or b is negative, but not both, the numerator is the square root of a negative number, which is an imaginary number, and I doubt you want to go there. Dolphin (t) 07:14, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed not. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 08:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Other cases: If a and b are both zero, you end up with 0/0, so the result is undefined. If only one of the two equals 0, the result is also 0. If a and b are both negative, the quotient is also negative. It is then equal to −0.5 if a and b are equal, and otherwise a negative number anywhere between −0.5 and 0.  --Lambiam 08:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My favorite proof is to let and , so and . Thus which, holding constant, reaches a maximum when which means . 2601:648:8202:350:0:0:0:2B99 (talk) 09:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]