Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 November 6

< 2010 November 5

2010 November 6

2010 November 7 >

Back to main feedback page

Index of all pages

User:Yiosie2356/The_Rogue_Crew[edit]

Is this draft okay to move to Wikipedia mainspace?

Yiosie2356 (talk) 01:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's okay but you need to add more references to the article, preferably using footnotes to display them properly. I hope this is useful in some way. Chevy monte carlo 05:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chickering's_theory_of_identity_development[edit]

I just created this page and just wanted to make sure that it meets all the Wikipedia standards. It's the first page I've created, so I may have made some errors.

Jncraton (talk) 13:03, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've done a nice job with the article so far, although I do think you might want to add more web-based references, if you can, although I can understand it may be quite hard to do so for these, more 'niche', subjects. Chevy monte carlo 05:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NuGet Package Manager http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Teh_klev/NuGet[edit]

I would like to start a new article on the recently released NuGet package manager for the .NET Framework.

I'd then like to link to this article from the List of software package management systems under Application Level Package Managers.

Any feedback would be very welcome.

Teh klev (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the main thing with your article is that it needs expanding perhaps. At the moment I think you've got the references covered (so far) but as you expand the article you will need to add more, but that's okay (I'm sure you understand that). Do you need any help linking the article elsewhere? If so, please contact me! Thanks :-) Chevy monte carlo 05:33, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Cities_Initiative[edit]

This article needs a ton of specialist assistance. Getting expertise in post-Soviet Russian-American relations would be extremely handy; my knowledge in these matters is limited. I've done my best to synthesise the available reliable information into the article as best I can but my time (as a student) is very limited and I'd appreciate back-up.

Racooon (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think with the references you already have you need to use footnotes to display them properly. I'm not that much of an expert on the article's subject although I can provide assistance in terms of the article's structure and formatting. I'm also not sure if you have enough references in the article; I can understand you are probably very busy in real life and don't have much time to work on the article (you do have a life as well...!) but I do think you need to try and add more, although if you can't really find any it tends to show that the article is just not notable enough for Wikipedia, and should not really be included. Chevy monte carlo 05:26, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I need to footnote stats and points, and I'm pretty poor at doing it (and I can't really get started tonight either since I have some work I need to do for tomorrow AM). There's no doubt in my mind it's a notable subject though; millions and millions of dollars have gone into the scheme and it's a pretty important subject for preventation of non state actor nuclear proliferation. In my mind anyway =P I'll crack on with it when I sort my life out and make more time Racooon (talk) 18:12, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Greatercelebrationchamber/Enter_your_new_article_name_here[edit]

I would like review of this entry for style.

Greatercelebrationchamber (talk) 17:42, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that the article is notable enough to worth having an article on Wikipedia. You need to add reliable references from third-party references - see WP:CITE and WP:VRS. If you need any help, please contact me. Finally, I think you need to be careful with the article's tone and point of view. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be neutral in tone, and not sound like advertisements. In some places I think the article just sounds like an advertisement for the church, at least in some places, so please try and take another look at the article and make some improvements; if you can. Thanks! Chevy monte carlo 05:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Fowler[edit]

I don't have any specific questions, really. I am just looking to have the article reviewed.

Thank you for your time.

User4079 (talk) 21:14, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to add more links and also maybe an infobox to the article. You also need to use the cite journal template for those magazine references, if you can. I've made a few improvements but I hope these suggestions are useful. Thanks! Chevy monte carlo 05:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MultiDendrograms[edit]

I have improved the article with the addition of several references. Is it OK now?

Sgj67 (talk) 23:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no idea what this article is about but it appears to be neutral and referenced so it is probably okay. It is already in the mainspace and I suspect a computer boffin will come along shortly to review it.--Ykraps (talk) 15:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]