Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 June 10
Goodartistscopy (talk) 00:14, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Please review McKinney and Associates in order to remove the "new entry" box.
ShannonMouton (talk) 00:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Phsaddlery (talk) 04:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
This article is relatively new, having been started by another editor. I have worked to improve this article as best as I can, and would like the opinion of a more senior editor on how this can be improved further.
Crablogger (talk) 04:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I would like this article reviewed--any constructive criticism?
Vincanet (talk) 04:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I would like this article reviewed--any constructive criticism?
Vincanet (talk) 04:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
This article is about a software application distributed for free or for a free via giderosmobile.com. Particularly it allows developers to write once and deploy on many devices.
Gorkemcetin74 (talk) 08:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Please check if the citations support the content in total. If no, what else can be added to sufficiently publish the article. Regards Rajat.madan (talk) 09:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
MalikAnasAhmad (talk) 09:55, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Sublime Magazine Check to make sure it is suitable for Wiki![edit]
Any comments or feedback on the article?
Steve Curtis (talk) 13:07, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Please could some review my article on the UK band ROMANCE. http://isthisromance.com
Edddddddddd (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I would be grateful for some feedback on this page. It is intended to complete a currently dead link on the Wikipedia page for the National Football Museum for the Langton Collection. The information has been compiled with the assistance of Langton's widow. Other than general style points, I am concerned that the early history of the collection, while verified by Mrs Langton, does not have outside sources, largely because it was pre-internet. I also think it could use some illustrations and photographs and may be able to add posters from some of the early exhibitions and perhaps some of the items.
Pjlangton55 (talk) 13:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Looking for some eyes on this page. It has once been deleted for sounding too "fan-based". A question of notability came up as well; one criticism was that the videos were all live (and anyone can do that)...Ayurveda has since debuted their first concept video, "Domestic Bliss". They did get points for having their recent LP, "H. Luminous" favorably reviewed by The Washington Post.
My take on notability: Ayurveda has a particularly strong fan-base among the Nepali community, both inside the States and in Nepal. Because Nepal is one of the poorest countries in the world with little media (tv, radio, etc.) available, new music travels by word-of-mouth & internet. Ayurveda is big in Nepal; kids have been clamoring to get them to tour over there for the last couple years. This year, October 11, Ayurveda will tour there and in India.
My point is with regard to notability is the denying of a page in Wikipedia seems like cultural elitism to me. Music lovers in Nepal would certainly hit on Ayurveda's wiki page as a encyclopedic source for all things pertaining to the band.
Feedback on the page itself?...Feedback on the notability issue? Many thanks & Namaste.Whysosirius (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
P.S. I did do a considerable amount of editing to the page taking into consideration feedback on the "sounding too fan-based" issue.Whysosirius (talk) 15:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Whysosirius (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
http://kentonline.newspaperdirect.com/epaper/viewer.aspx - Here they were on the front page of the Kentish Express. Is this now notable enough?
George Putland 17:06, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Is this good for upload? Please advise....my first posting. THANKS!
Jlird808 (talk) 19:08, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Article needs to rewritten from NPOV. Also addition of image logo in the infobox. Please suggest changes.
Rajat.madan (talk) 20:35, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Author is beginner--is interested in creating more sites about noteworthy artists who should be better known.
Idssf (talk) 20:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Could I get some help formatting the title in italics (without the quotation marks)?
Animalmagnetism (talk) 20:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like the italics were easily fixed already. The problem is there are no citations. ideally they would be independent, but that might be difficult. At the least, everything in the infobox should be stated in the prose with a source. Otherwise it looks like just an infobox and probably will be deleted. W Nowicki (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2011 (UTC)