Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 October 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

167.102.226.194 (talk) 12:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have used easily verifiable sources and kept the article concise and fact-driven. Any time you might have to review the piece would be greatly appreciated, thank you.


68.33.216.69 (talk) 13:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know if this article is okay to be on Wikipedia. If any changes are recommended, please let me know. For example, does it need to be shorter such as the ones for Manhattan Associates or Logility? I can edit the Magaya article down if needed. The previous Magaya article in 2009 was written by someone else, and it contained marketing language that this article does not contain. All the sources I can currently find are noted. I don't have any others. This is the first time doing this for me, so I want to make sure it passed before posting it. Thank you.


MSCS33172 (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I went ahead and tagged some parts with [citation needed] in your article, the external links need to be trimmed down; I removed a few non encyclopedic parts, and you have to explain why this company is notable before it should be moved to the mainspace again (read for more information WP:CORP). mabdul 14:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is about a magazine here in Montana. I'm having trouble adding an info box. The magazine info box template is confusing to follow and for some reason it's not translating to the preview page after I plug it in.


Fitzpatty88 (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Please review the article

167.102.226.194 (talk) 20:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm requesting help to deal with an ongoing issue related to my efforts to edit this article about Patrick M. Collins. We both work for the same firm, Perkins Coie, but my intention was to create an unbiased article that is completely fact-based and informative. I realize that my work on this article constitutes a potential conflict of interest, so I'm asking for your feedback/help in identifying some practical, doable steps I can take, with the help of the Wiki community, to ensure that the article passes muster with Wiki editors. Thank you so much! Zoeykennedy1 (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Rizzo was the acting General Counsel of the CIA for the first eight years after 9/11. A 34-year lawyer for the CIA, he was involved in the CIA-run black site prison system, the approval and use of enhanced interrogation techniques and signed off on all CIA-directed drone strikes until he retired in late 2009.


Mnnlaxer (talk) 21:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just added this page for my client, professional baseball player Drew Leachman. Having a problem making the second link work. Thanks for you help.


BWSportsMedia (talk) 22:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

please clear it i know you may not have heard of him but everything in the artile is factual you will find.


Swaggyxx (talk) 23:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pragmatic_works : Getting back the old page[edit]

Hello everyone. I'm trying to add a page for Pragmatic Works. But, when trying to add a new article, I bumped into this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Works (note: w in Works is in upper case)and it says the page has been deleted. It seems someone else has tried creating the page and it got deleted due to copyright infringement and unambiguous advertising. As part of the current page I'm trying to add on wiki, I was forced to use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatic_works (w in works is in lower case) instead of the other valid one. Can someone help me use the older page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatic_Works for putting the page contents instead of using the current one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatic_works. Thanks for your time.


GeekyPuppy (talk) 03:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]