Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Does the invocation sholok of Isha Upnishad talk about infinity?

Does the invocation sholok of Isha Upnishad talk about infinity?

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Wilkn (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. DVdm (talk · contribs)
3. Deacon Vorbis (talk · contribs)
4. Trovatore (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Infinity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2. Isha Upnishad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Infinity #Violation of Net neutrality (Isha Upnishad- invocation mantra)

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. Whether the invocation sholok in Isha Upnishad talks about the concept of infinity?
2. Whether the "Early Greek" follow the guidelines being asked of "Early Indian"?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Wilkn (talk) 14:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

   The citation needed is an acceptable method on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Citation needed. It is used in the article several times. There are valid citations. Please see Wikipedia:Acceptable sources. Wilkn (talk) 15:09, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

2. Don't agree. User Wilkn needs to learn what our policies say about wp:SYNTHESIS and WP:BURDEN, as was explained in [1] and elsewhere. - DVdm (talk) 14:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
3. Disagree per WP:DEADHORSE. As an aside, some of the concerns about the "Early Greek" section might be valid, but they should probably be raised separately. I've mostly been ignoring it and concentrating on the material that Wilkn wanted to add, so I'm disagreeing with this part on the grounds that it just hasn't been discussed. --Deacon Vorbis (talk) 16:22, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC) (Chairperson)