Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/February 2014 Euromaidan riots

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


February 2014 Euromaidan riots[edit]

Editors involved in this dispute
  1. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk · contribs) – filing party
  2. Paavo273 (talk · contribs)
  3. Lvivske (talk · contribs)
Articles affected by this dispute
  1. February 2014 Euromaidan riots (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

Issues to be mediated[edit]

Primary issues (added by the filing party)
  1. Statement about independence or any form of political autonomy of Lviv Oblast does not correspond reality and is a direct provocation to disinform about the events in the country and discredit Ukraine.
Additional issues (added by other parties)
  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation[edit]

  1. Agree. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Agree. --Львівське (говорити) 16:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Agree if someone wants to pursue it still. BUT... I think it SUBSEQUENTLY got worked out/hashed out on the talk page and went away. I believe this RfC was requested in the "heat of the moment." Paavo273 (talk) 22:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]

  • I will contact the third party about participating in this mediation. Sunray (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Paavo273 says that the issue has been resolved. I will check with filing party. Sunray (talk) 07:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reject. Two of the parties have said that the matter is largely resolved. The parties may initiate a new case should the need arise. For the Mediation Committee Sunray (talk) 06:04, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]