Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Lisa Robin Kelly - additions of uncited material, blasphemous edit summary, more

Lisa Robin Kelly - additions of uncited material, blasphemous edit summayr, more

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Tenebrae (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Zdawg1029 (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Lisa Robin Kelly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:Lisa Robin Kelly#In response to edit-warring editor

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

As the talk-page discussion above shows, by taking the two versions of the paragraph and dissecting them phrase-by-phrase:

1. Should the locale be mentioned even though none of the cited sources give it?
2. Should we use wordier phrases rather that shorter phrases that say same the same thing?
3. Should we add our own comments about what a cited source didn't say?
4. Should an editor say, "Yeah I'm not going to read all that" when you calmly and carefully give him an easy-to-read, a bullet-point breakdown to give specific reasons why various edits violate various policies/guidelines?
5. Should an editor blaspheme, insult you and tell you that he's going to add an uncited claim no matter what? "Jesus if you want to cry about it and make that big of a stink over something so stupid then we can use your wording here so long as that line is included."

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Tenebrae (talk) 04:58, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject: Fails to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #4 "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute at the article talk page and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice." One edit by Zdawg1029 does not constitute "extensive" discussion. For the Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC) (Chairperson)