Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Morocco

Morocco[edit]

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Closed as stale

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 21:38, October 16 2006 (UTC)

Involved parties[edit]

FayssalF (talk · contribs)
Koavf (talk · contribs)

Several other parties involved at different points and to different extents, including but not limited to:
A Jalil (talk · contribs)
Asterion (talk · contribs)
Aussie King Pin (talk · contribs)
Ecemaml (talk · contribs)
John Riemann Soong (talk · contribs)
LucVerhelst (talk · contribs)
OwenBlacker (talk · contribs)
Rhialto (talk · contribs)
Robdurbar (talk · contribs)
S710 (talk · contribs)
WilliamThweatt (talk · contribs)
Wikima (talk · contribs)
Yasser04 (talk · contribs)

Only those members active in the discussion from the past week have been notified.

Articles involved[edit]

Morocco

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:[edit]

RfC made on Politics, discussion started and continued at length.
Informal mediation carried on at talk, with no resolution between the parties. Editor suggested seeking mediation.

Issues to be mediated[edit]

Should the map at the article Morocco include Western Sahara?
- If so, in which way should this be depicted?

Comment - I don't know why i was invited to mediate on an issue which was sorted out by a double concensus ( current revision reached concensus twice - see 1st and and 2nd time within 4 months) declared by the majority of the wikipedians listed above! All i know is that the claiming part-Justin (koavf) who hasn't agreed yet that there was a concensus is the one to go file a report at the ArbCom. I mean mediation about what? -- Szvest 22:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The topic of the mediation has been agreed by consensus.
This mediation clearly goes against it
In my eyes it is non relevant
More importantly there is a much broader request from Jalil, myself and surely other people and which I hope I will formalise any time soon: clean out the Western Sahara related topics from all the POVs and propaganda and balance the information.

Thanks - wikima 18:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Parties' agreement to mediate[edit]

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree.

-Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 21:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Asterion^talk 21:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aussie King Pin 07:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--A Jalil 22:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--wikima 19:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--WilliamThweatt 21:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal We go forward from here; other parties are not currently editing Wikipedia (e.g. Yasser).

Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]

Accept

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[yell at me]} 19:27, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take on this case as your mediator. From here on out, let's use the talk page for mediation. Thanks. -^demon^{[yell at me]} 02:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.