This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
2.5 years of editing with around 15,000 edits. Not a fan of this feature, but am requesting it to prevent changes from pending for lengthy periods of time. Redthoreau-- (talk) 17:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
I always try to make Wikipedia better, and this is another way of helping. Besides, I used to patrol recent changes quite a bit (been a while, though) -Lilac Soul(Talk • Contribs) 12:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
I am a newer "New Pages Patrol" member. I followed the previous test cycle of the Pending Changes. I have been primarily focused on the Hell's Kitchen (U.S.) articles in trying to bring the articles up to the community standards. Thank you for your consideration. Hasteur (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Shakehandsman (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Hi, I'd like to try this please as I think it might be useful. I've been here since 2007, have a clean record, and almost 4,000 edits. Also I have rollback rights already so apparently that makes me a good candidate for this. Thanks.--Shakehandsman (talk) 22:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC) I create and edit articles that are biographies of musicians. Half of my time with the Wikipedia includes obtaining photos to provide a visual reference for them. In doing so, I find that before I can add a photograph to any biography article (especially BLPs), I end up having to copyedit each one, usually building infoboxes as I go along, before I can add a photo to the page. I find plenty of instances of vandalism and nearly every kind in violation of WP:MOS guidelines. I visit (and edit) far more articles than is the norm, and until recently was content to function more as a wikignome, flying under the radar of much notice, but I'd be a good person with some common sense and plenty of experience after these years working here. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 06:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
I feel that although my edits are less and I am not on here alot I would benefit from the tool as I currently have WP:rollback and use the automated tools for vandalism prevention such as huggle and twinkle, I feel that having the reviewer right will enable me to broaden my horizons on the wiki Corruptcopper (talk) 20:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Madison_Nguyen was assigned WP:PC at my request due to repeated anonymous edits, and I'd like to be able to resolve the continuing edits Jokeboy (talk) 06:51, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm able to recognise vandalism, a rollbacker and very coherent with current policies and guidelines. PoinDexta1 | Talk to Me 15:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
I do occasional vandal fighting, know policy well, and can spot subtle vandalism which often masquerades as "good edits." I also have rollback rights. Thanks for your consideration. VictorianMutant (talk) 20:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Have Rollback, and would love to expand my use on Wikipedia. More than a year and 1,500 edits and counting. Tofutwitch11(TALK) 00:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I am a novice contributor on wikipedia, currently having rollback, AWB rights. My current KRA is fighting Vandalism. Although my edit count is less but i feel that having the reviewer right will encourage me to contribute in an efficient manner as per Wikipedia guidelines, Also intention is to help resolve pending changes in timely manner. I think this would enable me further to help on wikipedia related projects. Abu Torsam 15:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Ask for the tool to edit in articles accepting the new policy. Already rollbacker so i know about the guidelines Ularevalo98 (talk) 07:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
I have been editing wikipedia for 6 months and have about 1000 edits to my credit. I already have Auto Wiki Browser and Rollback rights. I want to help out in the reviewing process, so I request you to grant me reviewer rights. Thanks in advance. Gremaldin (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
I believe I can be of use. I have rollback rights, been here for about 7 months and have 1500 edits. I understand the majority of rules and guidelines. My editing using Reviewer rights would be small, but I'd use it. George2001hi(Discussion) 17:49, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
DoneAlready done by HJ Mitchell Skier Dude (talk 02:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
While I am opposed to this generally I can see it's something that has come to stay. Please include me! L. Weaxzezz (talk) 18:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I've been around a while (~14,000 edits), have rollback, and am often combatting vandalism. Thank you for your consideration. CrazyPaco (talk) 11:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm a regular editor, in good standing (no blocks or sanctions), with a history of doing vandalism reverts VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 16:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
I am a recent change patroller and also do a not insignificant amount of editing in the climate change area where some articles remain under pending changes review. I'm still relatively new (~2 mos, ~500 edits, ~150 mainspace) but I think I've shown that I can handle the added responsibility. If this level of inexperience is insufficient, approximately when should I reapply? Sailsbystars (talk) 02:15, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Not to be impatient, but three people have applied after me and heard results... Could someone please take a look at my applications? Sailsbystars (talk) 02:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
I have Created and expanded many pages mostly on schools, Churches and Villages and most of the articles are written to a good standard M.Begg (talk) 18:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
I have been on wiki for over 2 years now, have over 4,000 edits done and would like this tool as a way to help the project more against vandalism. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Would like to assist in this new, interesting feature. I have read the recommended pages on this topic AeonicOmega(Watcha say?) 00:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Haven't got rollback or anything fancy like that, but have been using Twinkle for a while to achieve similar effects and have worked to try and keep items on my watchlist (and other articles too) free of vandalism in my spare time. Topperfalkon (talk) 21:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
I would be happy to assist in this effort and have familiarized myself with the Reviewing and Pending Changes documentation -- even fixed a typo this morning in Wikipedia:Pending changes/Metrics/Preliminary Analysis. I'm an established user and am very methodical and careful with my editing. I've been performing counter-vandalism and recent change patrolling since I first arrived here. Mojoworker (talk) 22:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
I do a lot of work on biographies and believe this functionality looks like a necessity for me to continue going forward Kernel Saunters (talk) 09:08, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
I have been a member of Wikipedia for 4 years and have 4000+ edits. My usual duty on Wikipedia is fighting vandalism using Huggle. I am skilled enough to recognize vandalism when it occurs in an article. This would help me extend my horizons a bit further than my usual duties. I am also a Rollbacker as well. Thanks for the consideration. Hmrox (talk) 21:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Reason for requesting Reviewer rights Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Recently, I have been going to pages marked with the "pending changes" notice in Recent Changes. I have noticed that the only way for me to remove pending changes which are vandalism is to load the previous version of the page and save that, thus removing the pending vandal changes. Just last evening (local time is Eastern Daylight Time), I noticed an IP creating vandal edits in 2010 Atlantic hurricane season and an unconfirmed user attempting to fix factual errors in the storm names. I had no way of rejecting the vandal edits without rejecting the good edits too.
For this reason, I am requesting Reviewer rights. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia just over a year now and I would like Reviewer rights so that I can make Anonymous user's contributions visible. I believe that I am able to gauge whether something is vandalism or a good faith, good quality edit. Regards, RockdrumBa-dumCrash(Driving well?) 18:10, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
KarlsenBot is active across Wikipedia, with nearly 25,000 edits. While my bot would not review edits to pending-changes protected pages made by other users, the flag would allow the bot's edits to existing approved revisions of level-two protected pages to be automatically reviewed, avoiding the need to manually accept the edits later. Many other bots, such as ClueBot, run with the reviewer permission for this reason. (When edits to unaccepted revisions of PC protected pages are made, the resulting revisions remain unapproved unless explicitly accepted. The bot would not accept revisions in this instance, and api.php contains no facilities for doing so.) Peter Karlsen (talk) 02:03, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm an on and off answerer on Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science which is currently on reviewer status due to sockpuppet vandalism. Reviewer rights would also become neccessary for me at a later date should this thing be rolled out more widely Sf5xeplus (talk) 20:30, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I often patrol new pages and would like to have the reviewer right in order to help out with the flagged revisions initiative. Unioneagle (talk) 00:34, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm a regular contributor to the Science Reference Desk, which is now using Pending Changes and Review. (I took most of 2010 off of the ref desk, but I seem to be getting back into it.) I keep very unusual hours, so I think I would be particularly helpful at providing prompt approval of any clearly acceptable questions and replies that are posted in the middle of the night (EST), when it's less likely that another reviewer would be available. Red Act (talk) 03:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
I already participate on reverting of vandalism as patroler and I'd like to help with confirming constructive edits on protected articles Petrb (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
I like to be of help on pages with pending revisions Crowsnest (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
YCurrently Done confirmed by KingpinBot (talk·contribs) (this user currently has the reviewer flag. Admins: remember to use a {{done}} template or alternative so the bot knows what the intended result is) - KingpinBot (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
I'd like to branch out and help review pending changes --NDSteve10 (talk) 01:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Note: Hi, and thanks for offering to help out by reviewing pending changes. Although the final say on WP:RFPERM issues always rests with an administrator (I am not one), I'd just like to point out that you only have 273 edits as of 06:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC). Usually, the reviewer permission is only granted to those with enough edits to establish a good track record of editing (see Wikipedia:Reviewer). Might I suggest that you continue to work on building great articles, then come back and request the permission again once you have plenty more edits? Of course, you never know - an admin might come along and give you the reviewer permission right away - but that's just a suggestion. ArcticNight 06:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment Arctic Night. I read through the criteria for reviewer very carefully, and I continue to believe my edit history shows I'd make a reliable, productive reviewer. Hopefully an administrator looking at my record will agree. I appreciate the friendly comment though, and I hope we will both continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. --NDSteve10 (talk) 08:38, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Actually Arctic Night I believe NDSteve is eligible for reviewer. Reviewer is basically a manual autoconfirmed process. It will likely become part of autoconfirmed later. --Alpha Quadranttalk 14:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Done, Arctic Night, please refrain from "closing" requests. Nakon 16:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
My normal edits to Wikipedia include fixing broken links, spelling mistakes, and grammar mistakes. I'm extremely detail oriented and would be more than happy to help review changes to popular articles. Linelor (talk) 04:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Note: Hi, and thanks for offering to help out by reviewing pending changes. Although the final say on WP:RFPERM issues always rests with an administrator (I am not one), I'd just like to point out that you only have 127 edits as of 06:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC). Usually, the reviewer permission is only granted to those with enough edits to establish a good track record of editing (see Wikipedia:Reviewer). Might I suggest that you continue to work on building great articles, then come back and request the permission again once you have plenty more edits? Of course, you never know - an admin might come along and give you the reviewer permission right away - but that's just a suggestion. ArcticNight 06:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
I appreciate the suggestion Arctic, I just wanted to offer my services if they are needed. I believe in quality before quantity, and by that principle I believe I qualify, but it is up to an admin to decide. Linelor (talk) 21:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Done. I note that Linelor has a history of good editing that dates back to March 2007. WJBscribe(talk) 20:54, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Well, I'm already a reviewer in de.wp since it was introduced there. Aside from writing articles the bulk of my work is related to proof reading, factual corrections and proper sourcing of articles, so I might as well give them the official review rubber stamp too after I've reviewed them inofficially anyhow Kmhkmh (talk) 01:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
I assist with patrolling NPP and RCP. I am also participating in the November GOCE drive to reduce the backlog of copyedit requests. Reviewer would provide additional tool to assist with these projects. jsfouche ☽☾talk 05:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I have always worked hard to adhere to the consensus guidlines and ensure that articles I work on maintain NPOV, especially articles that have been the subject of heated debate (e.g., Starchild skull). I also work to make sure articles abide by WP:BLP standards (e.g., List of Latter Day Saints). I have read the reviewing guidelines and understand all relevant Wikipedia policies) -Porlob (talk) 01:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I already have rollback rights, and I'd like to be able to help review edits that are made to articles on my watchlist, especially vandalism and incorrect information. LostHavoc(talk) 01:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing page thoroughly, and I whilst I do not have a lot of edits, I believe my edit history shows enough of a record to demonstrate I am familiar with Wikipedia policies and dedicated to improving Wikipedia article through quality content reviewing. Thanks. Aeonx (talk) 02:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm experience anti-vandalism user, have a rollback rights. I think I can help the Wikipedia even more. Sentinel R (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Not done A reviewer needs to have reasonably competent command over English to be able to review pages well. I may be wrong in my analysis, but I am not comfortable with your command of English. If you believe my analysis is faulty, kindly leave a reply detailing the reasoning. Regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 17:32, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I understand English but do not write very well. I have no spelling errors. If you do not assign me a status - that's okay. I can help the project without this status.Sentinel R (talk) 03:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
To simply put it, I have read the reviewer "reading list" and would like to review pending changes. I have also made 1,137 edits to Wikipedia in both my account and IP address. Also, I have been editing on Wikipedia for 4-5 months. Thanks! Perseus!Talk to me 19:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Recently, I have been very active reverting vandalism on Wikipedia using the Rollback Feature (via Huggle) and I would be very interested in helping out by 'reviewing' articles that have Pending Changes. From what I have read, I think this policy (if implemented) could be very beneficial to Wikipedia in regards to the vandalism of particular articles. Carmichael95 (talk) 06:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
After reading Wikipedia:Reviewing I am very interested in this feature. Although my participation on Wikipedia is somewhat sporadic I have a long history of edits, experience with Recent Changes Patrol and WP:NPP. I also currently have rollback privileges. Curtis (talk) 21:53, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Editing Wikipedia on and off for several years, I'm familiar with the basic concepts and policies. By reviewing the pending changes in my watch list, I hope to help in making Wikipedia even better. ElComandanteChe (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Whilst I do not have a huge number of edits; I have become increasingly active on Wikipedia recently and created a couple of new pages. Although I am as guilty of the odd spelling mistake and typo as anyone else, I have a fluid command of English and believe my edits have improved article quality. I have read Wikipedia:reviewing and believe I am reasonably familiar with Wikipedia policy. I have recently worked to improve my understanding of copyright policy and referencing. Pol430 (talk) 15:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I feel that I can help Wikipedia even more by making it free of trash and clutter. This will make Wikipedia look clean and fresh. I have a lot experience with editing Wikipedia and feel that Wikipedia needs me. I understand everything about Wikipedia from vandalism to partly copyright. Not to mention I have high skills in English. Smiley4541 (Push to talk) 15:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm an fairly active Wikipedia editor (some months more than others) since my first edit on January 6, 2006. Next to a large number of small edits I've created a number of articles and made major modifications to others. I add most of the articles I've created or made major modifications to to my watch list and monitor them daily to see if new edits meet Wikipedia's (and my own) standards and revert them when this is not the case. A number of articles I follow however have recently become "PC protected". I think my edit history shows that I can really help in recognizing and reverting bad and/or vandalistic edits. Since I'm dyslexic (and Englisch is not my primary language) I'm not the best when it comes to correcting spelling mistakes. But recognizing vandalism, just plain wrong or unsourced edits is something I can do really well as my edit history will reflect. Cyzor (talk) 20:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
I've been on WP for quite a long time. Though my edits dropped in the past few months, I'm giving more time these days. I'm mostly into India related articles. I've also been patrolling new pages. I've created quite a few articles too.Nirvanareborn|TeenSpirit 22:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
I am an active editor of Wikipedia for quite a long time, even though I registered just 3 months ago. I am a member of WikiProject Film and WikiProject Video games, and my work usually refers to movies and video games that have yet to came out, so almost every article where I go, there is vandalism and unsourced changes. My work is to revert that vandalism and improve unsourced changes that other editors doing. I am also in a good way familiar with Wikipedia:Copyrights and I have read reviewing process. InfamousPrince 15:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I have been fairly active in counter-vandalism in the past, and, although school has definitely gotten in the way with this, I am going to start becoming more active as school dies down, and through my coming work terms. I believe that this would be a great step in this direction, and would allow me to diversify my work. Aremithtlk|eml 23:16, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I've been editing Wikipedia since 2003 (before it was cool) and I'm very familiar with the broad concepts of Wikipedia policy. I have at times participated in patrolling recent changes and similar gnomish jobs. Kwekubo (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
I am an active user who actively battles vandalism both manually and using STiki. I also frequently edit pages for content and occasionally author pages. AndySpeak to Me (Breathe)Contribs 02:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
I would like to help along the ongoing anti-vandalism efforts any way I can. I also think that edit reveiwing should be implemented across Wikipedia as this will help said efforts along nicely Barts1a (talk) 13:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
This would be a helpful tool in addition to the rollback permissions I already have on both my accounts (User:Andrew Kelly and User:AK Auto). I am only requesting permission for User:Andrew Kelly though. Cheers! Andrew Kelly (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I have a solid vandal-fighting record and an interest in reviewing edits for approval. Note that I have been previously granted the right, but requested it be removed because I didn't trust myself at the time. Dylan620(t • c) 22:37, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
I have a solid history in vandalism fighting; been out of the game since May 2010, but have been contributing via Huggle recently thanks to my rollback privs, and believe that reviewer privs would also be a useful tool. Rubicon | Talk 12:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
I have been here for over a year, and have Rollback rights. I use Huggle frequently, and I enjoy patrolling the recent changes. I frequently add articles to the Requests for protection, and those are usually accepted. I believe having the Reviewer privelege, I can help Wikipedia even more. --AlxeedoTALK 20:57, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
I helped out with the new user patrol and new page patrol back in the day. Been idle for a while, but I’d love to help with this test of the reviewer system. cipherswarm (talk) 03:09, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
I've been an editor since September 2006. Although I signed up at Wikipedia to sub-edit, fix obvious problems including fixing typos, most of my changes are recent change patrol / anti-vandalism. I feel I can also be useful to the project by approving good edits from IP / non-autoconfirmed editors. Kiore (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
I have read the reviewer reading list and would like to be able to review pending changes. I have been an active Wikipedia editor for many years and a registered user for over a year (since August 2009). I am very active and always open to discussion. Regards. Gaius Octavius Princeps (talk) 19:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm a regular contributor with more than 16,000 edits, and I've successfully nominated several FAs, GAs and DYKs. I understand all of the policies included in the reviewer criteria, including WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:NOT, WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. I'm a stickler for reliable sources, and I routinely try to combat vandalism and unsourced information. — HunterKahn 06:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Not done... because I gave you this flag around six months ago, on 13 June. Courcelles 06:57, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I have been on Wikipedia since 2006, and am active in the past year. I have edited many articles, and am watching many. I have always followed the basic Wikipedia policies, and will strive to follow them. I usually keep a cool head, and am open to discussion MikeLynch (talk) 13:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
I've been working on many articles on Wikipedia for some years now. I created from scratch the article on the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users and I have worked on many other articles, most notably the Queens of the Stone Age article recently. I always try to fix grammatical and readability problems. AC (talk) 22:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Regularly monitor articles on my watchlist. Some of these are now pending changes, and I'm happy to help review them. Editor for a number of years, with knowledge of appropriate policies. Inas66 (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
Frequently hop by the recent changes page and of course my watchlist; I also give a hand to new users and on the helpdesk when I can answer. I feel I have a good grasp of policies and what not and a good editing record overall, and I would be glad to help review pages-in-waiting. Cheers - «CharlieEchoTango» 05:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
I have been an editor for a little over a year. I have a decent amount of anti-vandalism experience using twinkle. There are a few pages on my watchlist that have this program on and experience some vandalism that i would like to deny instead of rolling them back with twinkle. Guerillero | My Talk 22:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
I have done a lot of combating vandalism with Twinkle. I am also a frequent new pages patroller. I want review rights so I can help fight more vandalism. Winner 42Talk to me! 00:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm a well-established user with many edits. I already have rollback rights, I'm well-versed in the relevant policies and I feel that I am more than capable of taking on further anti-vandalism responsibilities. Kevin W. 03:15, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I have been contributing to Wikipedia for several years without an account. Recently I have started using an account so all my edits would be in the same place. I am familiar with Wikipedia policies and rules and I would like to be more of help by becoming a reviewer Andrei.stanescu (talk) 22:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I've been editing articles for some time now. I try to fix any errors in any articles and also patrol new users' contributions for any nonconstructive edits. Thank you. Novice7 Talk 13:25, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I've been an active editor of wikipedia for a good while, and tend to deal with vandalism edits as they occur on my watchlist, I've noticed some pages that I review are now subject to pending changes and reviewer rights would help me to keep those pages more up-to-date. I've used twinkle and the various antivandalsim features for a several months, and feel I have enough participation to demonstrate a neutral attitude and familiarity with wikipedia's core values such that I can be trusted with this tool. Ajbpearce (talk) 15:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Frequent content editor, and regularly patrol recent edits, as well as my own large watchlist. Seeing a few Pending Changes showing up, so would be helpful to have reviewer rights. KorruskiTalk 09:17, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I've been an editor since early 2007. Although I shied away from creating articles until this Autumn (I tried to keep a low profile, but I really can't anymore), I have experience with reverting vandalism, dealing with sockpuppets, and consensus. I started two articles (one DYK) this year, and one of them now has Pending Changes protection. I do my best to keep my activity on Encyclopedia Dramatica separate from my activity on Wikipedia, although some users do try to drag ED issues here. While on Wikipedia, Wikipedia comes first. I'm familiar with WP:BLP and WP:RS policies. I regularly check my I'm confident in my abilities and hope you could trust me with the tools to improve this encyclopedia. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I've been on Wikipedia for a few years now, I read/edit articles of my interest, and I add information that is missing from articles, do cleanups/re-sectioning and correct mistakes. Sonixrulerz (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
I would like to become a reviewer just to help out in the area. I've recently started editing again, but I understand the major policies, already have rollback rights and have a lot of experience with vandalism. Forentitalk 05:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
I am expierenced with reverting vandalism and I am very familiar with Wikipedia's policies and rules. I already have Autopatrolled status and have created a lot of articles. Having Reviewer status would be alot more useful in my work. Jaguar (talk) 19:23, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Long time member of Wikipedia community, familiar with all policies on editing and copyright permissions, rollbacker. ERK talk 22:44, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Done Nakon 14:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Already done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:59, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Currently Done confirmed by KingpinBot (talk · contribs) (this user currently has the reviewer flag. Admins: remember to use a {{done}} template or alternative so the bot knows what the intended result is) - KingpinBot (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Note: Hi, and thanks for offering to help out by reviewing pending changes. Although the final say on WP:RFPERM issues always rests with an administrator (I am not one), I'd just like to point out that you only have 273 edits as of 06:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC). Usually, the reviewer permission is only granted to those with enough edits to establish a good track record of editing (see Wikipedia:Reviewer). Might I suggest that you continue to work on building great articles, then come back and request the permission again once you have plenty more edits? Of course, you never know - an admin might come along and give you the reviewer permission right away - but that's just a suggestion. Arctic Night 06:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Not done