Wikipedia:Scientific peer review/Ediacaran biota
This article is currently under conventional peer review (View); I would like to encourage any comments on its scientific accuracy and content.
Verisimilus 16:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but as I said on the talk page, there seems to be a certain anmount of POV pushing, reducing genuine scientific debates to the preferred view, and, in one case, what appears to be misunderstanding of a source on clarifying Linnean taxonomy as showing that taxonomy did not work at all.
Don't get me wrong: There's a lot of good parts in this article, but too much is springing up as dubious or over-simplified, and checking sources confirmed some of this, and so I'm uncomfortable with this article. But I'm not an expert on the Ediacaran, so I can't be sure I'm catching everything. In other words, much of this is good, but there's enough errors that I can catch that I'm worried about errors I didn't. Adam Cuerden talk 11:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC) Mostly fixed now. Adam Cuerden talk 12:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)