Wikipedia:Scientific peer review/Molybdenum

Molybdenum[edit]

Well, molybdenum was pretty fleshed-out before I started working on it. My main goal was to just find good sources. I'd appreciate any feedback at all, especially regarding missing information or not-comprehensive-enough parts. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 23:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've also added it to WP:PR so you should get some feedback here from there too. --Bduke 00:41, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I can never figure out how to transclude reviews. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 15:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review by SpecialWindler[edit]

Some suggestions

For a transition metal, can the Characteristics be expanded?
The first paragraph of Applications, could be split into two paragraphs done
The following sections are stubs and should probably be merged or expanded
- Copper-molybdenum antagonism
- Isotopes
  - Although there is a main article for that, it should be expanded a little
- Precautions
Category's should be in alphebetical order (numbers then letters) done
Do you have a citation for this statement
- "In 2005, USA was the top producer of molybdenum with about 30% world share followed by Chile and China, reports the British Geological Survey."
There is an external link that links to wikipedia, this should be moved to "See Also" done

Thats a quick review. SpecialWindler 09:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Windler. I'm going to go back to the library to get some more isotope information. I know exactly what I want to get. I'll also try to expand the other sections. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 15:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put some literature onto the talk page which might help in a history section, the chemistry and the toxicology.--Stone 11:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Climax, Colorado as one of the biggest Molybdenum mines between 1915 and 1980 should be mentioned.--Stone 14:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The production of pure Mo from MoO₃ and H₂ and the production of FeMo from iron and molybdenum oxides in a electrical oven should be mentioned.--Stone 14:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]