Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/July
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
July 29[edit]
Category:Mehsana district geography stubs[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Upmerge per nom. Ruslik_Zero 16:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Only 11 articles in category; scan suggests only a a couple more. Upmerge. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support upmerge per OM. Grutness...wha? 23:06, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support upmerge per nom. Airplaneman ✈ 16:06, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support upmerge per nom. Dana boomer (talk) 11:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
July 22[edit]
{{PRC-company-stub}}[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was kept. Nomination made by banned user. Grutness...wha? 08:23, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to {{PRChina-company-stub}} as per other PRChina-foo-stubs. 61.18.170.102 (talk) 20:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There should be a split between Cat:People's Republic of China company stub and Cat:Chinese company stubs. The former should be reserved for companies established within communist China after 1949, and those established and controlled by the ruling communists. 112.118.149.146 (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ignore this the contrib list of the originating IP address show it restoring edits made by a known banned user. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
{{ROC-geo-stub}} to {{RoChina-geo-stub}} or {{ROChina-geo-stub}}[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was kept. Nomination made by banned user. Grutness...wha? 08:23, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename. 210.177.66.30 (talk) 15:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, no solid reason for renaming has been given. Nyttend (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is because ROC isn't an unambiguous abbreviation for the Republic of China (though the Republic of China is the most prominent among those sharing the same abbreviation). It also has to match with the established convention such as PRChina-foo-stub, NewZealand-geo-stub, DRCongo-geo-stub, etc. 61.18.170.85 (talk) 11:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ignore this the contrib list of the originating IP address show it restoring edits made by a known banned user. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Botswanan people stubs[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:31, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Propose renaming Category:Botswanan people stubs to Category:Botswana people stubs
- The parent category is Category:Botswana people and all the other subcategories of it are named "Botswana FOO". This usage has been selected by consensus and has been used for some time now: see this CFD; more recent CFDs have followed, along the same lines of argument. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong support, for the sake of normalisation, and because there is no such word as "Botswanan". (The correct demonym would actually be "Batswana", but unless I'm mistaken "Botswana" is acceptable in everyday usage.) Aridd (talk) 11:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
July 2[edit]
{{Antimicrobial-stub}} / Category:Antimicrobial stubs[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Merge. ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Used on 78 pages.
- Merge with {{Antiinfective-agent-stub}} which follows WikiProject Pharmacology's categorisation and naming scheme. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 11:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per nom.--Lenticel (talk) 03:37, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.