Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2011/August/23

August 23[edit]

Subcarpathian geography stubs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy rename, per rename of permcat

Cat:Subcarpathian geography stubs → Cat:Podkarpackie geography stubs
{{Subcarpathian-geo-stub}} → {{Podkarpackie-geo-stub}}

Speedy renames to match renamed article and categories. Severo^TC 07:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rename of {{Victoria-geo-stub}}[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As pointed out at WikiProject Western Australia after the recent rename of Perth-stub, "If Perth-stub has to be renamed because Perth's a dab page, why is Victoria-geo-stub used for Victoria (Australia)?". Which is a perfectly valid point. As such, this should be renamed to {{VictoriaAU-geo-stub}}, deleting the current name, especially since there is a fair possibility we'll need something similar for the place in Canada at some point. Grutness...wha? 09:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.