Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 November 4

< November 3	November 5 >

November 4[edit]

Template:Coiq[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 12 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:04, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Coiq (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sport Club Corinthians Paulista squad 2000 FIFA Club World Championship[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was No consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:03, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sport Club Corinthians Paulista squad 2000 FIFA Club World Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Sport Club Corinthians Paulista squad 2012 FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question @Frietjes: What is the actual rationale for deletion here? "Unused" doesn't sound to me like a correct rationale here. It is quite simple to insert this template in all the players articles and there are enough blue-linked for it to be useful for navigation. The question shouldn't be whether it's used (as that is more easily remedied by inclusion than by deletion), but rather if it should be used. If you are in the mind that the winning squad of the FIFA Club World Championship shouldn't be in a template (as for example the winners of the AFL Grand Final are - you can find the most recent example here) then you should nominate all the templates in the category under the correct rationale. --SuperJew (talk) 17:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- the full rationale is as listed in item 3 at the top of WP:TFD. the fact that it has been unused for many months = unlikely to be used. you are welcome to put it to use and the rationale no longer applies. Frietjes (talk) 14:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fine, I transcluded it in the relevant pages. Shame you chose to persist about a technicality instead of using your common sense. --SuperJew (talk) 17:48, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is used. Nomination rationale is incorrect. --SuperJew (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Despite the above, consensus is that templates of Club World Championships / Cups don't warrant templates (see Chelsea 2012, Auckland 2014, Deportivo Saprissa 2005). Macosal (talk) 23:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The examples you brought are all non-winning squads. The question should be if a winning squad is notable. However this nomination's rationale is "unused", which is just incorrect, a technicality and quite frankly petty. --SuperJew (talk) 09:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Barely notable. These sorts of templates should be deleted due to their irrelevance. A season article should comprise who played in the final, and what was the squad which lifted the trophy, not a template. MYS 77 ^✉ 02:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Now that this is used, this should be discussed further. @Frietjes: Does this change your opinion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

comment, still say delete, but for squad notability reasons given above. note that they were unused at the time of nomination, and it is only used now due to this batch of edits. Frietjes (talk) 22:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
comment precedent for having or not having this type of squad templates can be found by this search. Frietjes (talk) 22:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- precedent can be found at the appropriate category. --SuperJew (talk) 08:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SZSECI[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was No consensus. No consensus has been reached after two relists. Jax 0677 (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SZSECI (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Since Shenzhen Stock Exchange Component Index Constitute Stocks was expanded from 40 to 500, either included many red-linked article into the template, or violating NPOV by adding unknown selection criteria into the template in order to maintain it (company with wikipedia article isn't usually as notable as company without one). Matthew_hk t c 16:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There was another index that included the top 100 only, given SZSE have 1700 company only. Matthew_hk t c 16:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment what i mean on full of red link zh:template:SZSECI Matthew_hk t c 15:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment since Category:Companies listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange only have 68 companies. Assume all companies listed in Shenzhen Stock Exchange are correctly cated, which means if the template was correctly updated, it would have 86.4% red links. certainly breakup the guideline in Wikipedia:Navigation template. Matthew_hk t c 14:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment New template Template:SZSE 100 Index was created for the large cap, and Template:SZSE 200 Index (for mid cap) may worth to create. After the creation, constituents currently in Shenzhen Stock Exchange Component Index but not in top 300 (SZSE 100 Index + SZSE 200 Index = SZSE 300 Index) that have wikipedia article were Chenming Paper, Tianjin TEDA Co. and ZQGame. or blue-link rate of 1.5%. Either keep the Template:SZSECI and transclusion Template:SZSE 100 Index and Template:SZSE 200 Index into it, or delete it. Matthew_hk t c 18:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bootleg Beatles[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bootleg Beatles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates {{The Bootleg Beatles timeline}} Frietjes (talk) 18:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox drug2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox drug2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Kabadii tournament[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Kabadii tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is not used anywhere. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox kabaddi tournament[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox kabaddi tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is not used anywhere. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hangugeo[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Snow merge (non-admin closure) Ppp ery 13:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hangugeo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Korean (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Hangugeo with Template:Korean.
Duplicate templates. Hangugeo was created because Korean didn't have a "labels" parameter. This could easily be incorporated into the older template. Primefac (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Template:Korean: Good proposal. I think that the first in a page should not depend on a template. Sawol (talk) 04:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Template:Korean: Agree with this proposal. DandanxD (talk) 09:49, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Template:Korean: I completely agree. Ry's the Guy ^{(talk|contribs)} 19:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Template:Korean: I completely agree with the above votes and the original proposal. Mikepellerin^talk 01:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Native American name[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Native American name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Misleading and inaccurate to presume a standard cultural naming practice for the widely varied groups of Native American people Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with you if it read "Native americans don't have last names" but that's not what it says. That being said, this doesn't appear to be in use in any way, so Delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:52, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spanish name/Indigenous[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Spanish name/Indigenous (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Misleading and inaccurate used to tag native names as Spanish Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused and redundant. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:American name for married women[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:American name for married women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template does not and cannot reflect current American cultural practices so is misleading Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – pointless. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:57, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is used in exactly one article. Most of the time a subject's name, and any previous names are explained in the article text so this is essentially redundant. I wold also posit that most English speakers understand how married names work, among those who choose to use them at all. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:55, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:World Series Boxing box[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:World Series Boxing box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:45, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:X1template[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:X1template (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to {{X1}}. Ppp ery 16:04, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see the point of redirecting it. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:01, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yaroslavl direction style[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yaroslavl direction style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Year in country category/core[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Year in country category/core (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Year in country category/parent 1/Jersey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Year in country category/parent 2/Jersey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused sub template Frietjes (talk) 14:41, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

I have been doing some work on this. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Template:Year in nation[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Year in nation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Years in Mali[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in Mali (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Years in Chad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates (1) the navigation provided by the floating box at the top of the article, (2) the navigation provided by the category. Frietjes (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I placed this in 2013 in Mali, to see what the visual effect is. While it highlights the incompleteness of our YYYY in Mali pages, I'm not sure that it adds much utility. Do we do this for other countries? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:00, 6 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]
- Based on this category it seems we do. --SuperJew (talk) 11:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Youth I-League U15[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Youth I-League U15 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and all red links Frietjes (talk) 14:34, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YtUserInfobox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:YtUserInfobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused infobox, probably duplicate {{infobox character}} Frietjes (talk) 14:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yuanxiao[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yuanxiao (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Zhongyuan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 14:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yugoslavia squad - 1967 FIBA World Championship for Women[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 12 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:47, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yugoslavia squad - 1967 FIBA World Championship for Women (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle team - 2014-2015[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:56, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ZAKSA Kędzierzyn-Koźle team - 2014-2015 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, should be transcluded, merged with an article, or deleted Frietjes (talk) 14:29, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ZC3H12B[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ZC3H12B (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused after updates to ZC3H12B Frietjes (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ZVV stations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ZVV stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:ZVV lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes (talk) 14:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:American name[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:American name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unhelpful for articles. Ties with Template:Hawaiian name, Template:Canadian name, and Template:Australian name. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 14:16, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - serves no useful purpose. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:22, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – the most pointless of all of these... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Appllied education[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G11 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Appllied education (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a template; article-like content from a contributor with an obvious WP:COI. Drm310 (talk) 14:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

speedy delete as tagged. Frietjes (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zanzibar Government of National Unity 2010[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zanzibar Government of National Unity 2010 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Zambia cabinet table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Zambia First Cabinet (1964) table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, should be merged with an article if needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zwolle-Almelo railway[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 16:11, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zwolle-Almelo railway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused with no parent article Frietjes (talk) 14:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have created a parent article for this diagram: Zwolle–Almelo_railway. --ziggyziggyziggy (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clube Atlético Mineiro squad 2013 FIFA Club World Cup[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus for Template:São Paulo FC squad 2005 FIFA Club World Championship, delete the rest. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Clube Atlético Mineiro squad 2013 FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Cruz Azul squad 2014 FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:ES Sétif squad 2014 FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Guangzhou Evergrande F.C. squad 2013 FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Raja Casablanca squad 2013 FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:San Lorenzo de Almagro squad 2014 FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:São Paulo FC squad 2005 FIFA Club World Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Western Sydney Wanderers FC squad 2014 FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-notable squad. Frietjes (talk) 22:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Template:São Paulo FC squad 2005 FIFA Club World Championship, as it is a squad of the championship winner. I still want to see comments about why winner squads aren't notable. There is a category for them. The non-winning squads I agree are non-notable. --SuperJew (talk) 08:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

if the squad were notable, there would be a parent article. as it stands, there is no parent article, and no mention of the squad in 2005 FIFA Club World Championship. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again you are confusing notability and existence. The fact that something is notable doesn't mean it has necessarily been created (yet) and the fact that something exists doesn't necessarily mean it's notable (hence AFDs exist).

@Frietjes: Regarding the statement "if the squad were notable, there would be a parent article": Olympics football squads (for example Brazil 2016), Football World Cup squads (for example Australia 2014), and more international competitions have squad navboxes for each nation, even if that nation was eliminated in the first rounds. These templates don't have parent articles. What is the rationale there for their existence, or should they all be contenders for TFD? --SuperJew (talk) 17:24, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yes, they should be deleted if the subject is not notable enough to have an article. for the 2016 Summer Olympics, we have Football at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's team squads. Frietjes (talk) 17:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And for the proposed squads we have 2005 FIFA Club World Championship squads. I fail to see the difference. --SuperJew (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:58, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mexican TV by channel number[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was No consensus. No consensus has been reached after two relists. Jax 0677 (talk) 19:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mexican TV by channel number (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

navigation template that links nearly only links to disambiguation pages and semi-disambugation pages like Channel 2 TV stations in Mexico. The Banner talk 12:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note I'm mostly here to provide clarification on some major changes that I've put into the lists. Effective October 27 (but being put in the lists now because of the launch of a new TV network, Mexico went from assigning virtual channels to stations based on their old analog channel numbers to assigning them based on network. That means *far* fewer pages are required on the virtual channel side. The primary reason I created this navbox was because some navigation functionality was lost when these lists were converted from categories. Raymie (t • c) 17:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asseco Resovia Rzeszów team - 2014-2015[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asseco Resovia Rzeszów team - 2014-2015 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-notable squad. Frietjes (talk) 21:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Why is a team that actually won the 2014–15 PlusLiga and finished fourth in the 2015–16 CEV Champions League not-notable? The Banner talk 22:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

anyone who wants to know the 2014–15 PlusLiga squad can find it at 2014–15 PlusLiga squads. Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlético Petróleos de Luanda (basketball) 2012-2013[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlético Petróleos de Luanda (basketball) 2012-2013 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Atlético Petróleos de Luanda (basketball) 2013-2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-notable squad. Frietjes (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They only won the Angola Cup in both years... The Banner talk 23:02, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the squad is for 2012–13 BAI Basket and 2013–14 BAI Basket. Frietjes (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence? The Banner talk 18:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

click on the links in the template titles. Frietjes (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And in both cases they finished third... But it is an option to transclude the text in the article. The Banner talk 18:49, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlético Sport Aviação 2012-13[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:58, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlético Sport Aviação 2012-13 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-notable squad. Frietjes (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As the competition is finished, the squad (and all other of that competition) can be added to the article 2013 Girabola as plain text (i.e. not as template). The Banner talk 22:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- so we are going to have the 13th place squad in the article, but none of the others? that seems WP:UNDUE. Frietjes (talk) 14:43, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlético Petróleos de Luanda (handball) Women's 2012-2013[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete, unused with no plans for use. If you would like to use the template, let me know and I will restore it. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Atlético Petróleos de Luanda (handball) Women's 2012-2013 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Atlético Petróleos de Luanda (handball) Women's 2013-2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-notable squad. Frietjes (talk) 21:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not-notable? Even after finishing runner-up Angola Women's Handball League and winning the African Women's Handball Champions League? The Banner talk 22:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Needs table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 November 12 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:54, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Needs table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:List to table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Latest preview release templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:26, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest preview release/The KMPlayer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Full list

This entire group of templates is unused. Meant to hold text outside the article with the intention to make it "easier" to edit, their parent articles have either been renamed, redirected, moved, or otherwise stopped using them. These fall under "not used and not likely to be used" category (TFD reasons #3). Only top template has tfd links to avoid transclusion errors. Primefac (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just unlisted {{Latest preview software release/Windows 10}} from this nomination because its problem is solved and the Windows 10 article is using it. I hope I am doing the right thing. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 10:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Codename Lisa, that's fine. I thought it was a bit odd it was on the list, so if it's in use it shouldn't be on this particular batch of nominations. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. Looks like uncontroversial cleanup. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 10:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 13:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – any that are superseded by full versions. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 21:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).