Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 February 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 27 March 1 >

February 28[edit]

Template:South Carolina Stingrays seasons[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Train2104 (t • c) 06:09, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly redlinks to non-notable pages. Yosemiter (talk) 22:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Delete The only entries are now redirects....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LasVegasWranglersCoach[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not used on any pages and list of coaches is also on Template:Las Vegas Wranglers. Yosemiter (talk) 21:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Josh Trank[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trank has only directed two movies. This template was previously deleted, then brought back with his television production information only to have that deleted. Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 20:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Smiles of a Summer Night[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is really a beneficial navbox. It's all a bit too tangential. This is the sort of thing that should be addressed in the article text, or through "see also" linking. The song isn't directly related to the film, as it's from a musical inspired by the film. It just doesn't sit right with me. WP:NENAN. -- Rob Sinden (talk) 15:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep. -It's definitely confusing in it's current state, but I think it could be repurposed to add some navigational value.--Molandfreak (talk, contribs, email) 19:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I stand behind templates with four links although I think policy is to keep templates with three links. Thus, even if you discount the song entirely the template should be kept. This subject has 3 or 4 related subjects worthy of inclusion in a navbox making it a legitimate navbox.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Above & Beyond Barnstar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies, as does userfication if requested. Primefac (talk) 02:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

template has a subst: counterpart. Only found on two user pages (at most) Made redundant by other barnstars. *Kat* (talk) 11:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, a search of pages which link to the image return only two talk pages. so, I believe we can safely assume this one is no longer being used, nor was it every widely used. Frietjes (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature/sandbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a sandbox connected to a template that doesn't seem to serve any purpose.... *Kat* (talk) 11:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep All templates have sandboxes it is part of the standard development cycle for templates—see the link at the end of any doc subpage of any template, eg see the last section below the documentation of Template:A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature. *Kat* where else would you propose that further development of templates ought to take place? I am surprised that someone who has an account since 2004 would not know this. -- PBS (talk) 19:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close -- PBS (talk) 19:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've been off the grid for a while. Trying to get my hand back in. --*Kat* (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sinoy Joseph[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Train2104 (t • c) 14:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template created by new user who seems unaware that templates are supposed to be used on multiple pages. David.moreno72 07:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anarchist Library text[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 02:33, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any links that would this external link template could be written in standard link notation. This said, this site hosts works of either dubious copyright status or full copyright violation. Unless the respective authors permit the site to host their works, it's against our copyright practice to actively link it. Recommend deletion for its remaining two uses rather than substitution. czar 05:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dizzy Dee[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Train2104 (t • c) 14:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly too soon with only one directly related article at this time, and even that one has some notability concerns. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thats true, thank you for the advice, I had never done a template before — Preceding unsigned comment added by Desiresibbs (talk • contribs) 02:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RocheLexicon[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 9. Primefac (talk) 02:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Full Metal Jousting[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Train2104 (t • c) 14:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We don't include cast and crew per WP:PERFNAV. This leaves production company, which is also unsuitable for navbox inclusion. Useless. Rob Sinden (talk) 16:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Project[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Train2104 (t • c) 14:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No cast and crew in navboxes per WP:PERFNAV. That's all this is. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISP 1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 March 9. Primefac (talk) 02:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_February_28&oldid=1136066672"