Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 26[edit]

Template:Districts of the Metropolitan Association of Upper Silesia[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This template is only transcluded onto Metropolitan Association of Upper Silesia and nowhere else. ToThAc (talk) 18:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - per nom. Template has sat dormant for almost 10 years. -- Gokunks (Speak to me) 02:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Keep - Wouldn't it be better to put the template on each of those pages in order to aid in navigation? It doesn't make sense to delete something when it is not being used enough but has the chance to be (unless I am missing something about its relevance to the topic). Nihlus 00:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged BladesGodric 06:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ARPrelim[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged BladesGodric 15:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; at first I thought this was unused because it is being substituted, but the instructions specifically say that it should not be substituted. Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I don't know a huge amount about Arbcom, but I'm guessing the frequency is low and the template is removed quickly. The template is referenced at Wikipedia:Abuse response/Guide to abuse response. I'd suggest a merger into Template:ARA Bellezzasolo Discuss 16:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note The ArbCom clerks have been notified, but I did not want to relist this discussion until tomorrow due to the high number of templates currently listed on today's TFD list. Primefac (talk) 15:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Merge As an ArbCom clerk, I find this useful. Miniapolis 00:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
{{ARA|prelim}} doesn't seem much different than ARPrelim, so what about a merger? (certainly shouldn't be deleted though) Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging Miniapolis just in case they don't see this reply/relist. Primefac (talk) 14:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, a merge is a better idea. Miniapolis 15:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC) "Prelim" is not a valid parameter for {{ARA}} and I have yet to see this template used by my fellow ArbCom clerks, so delete. Miniapolis 14:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rough Guide 2002[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Along with:

All red links. Unused. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 07:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).