Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 February 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 9 February 11 >

February 10[edit]

Empty test cases[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 09:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contain no actual tests, just the "testcases" template copied mostly unmodified or an entirely blank page. (I can't figure out how to get a TfD tag to show on a \testcases page, so I haven't tagged any of them) * Pppery * it has begun... 20:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I was notified about the MARC template, since I created it. I don't remember why, so feel free to delete. --WMSR (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • StringFunc/testcases was created as part of a discussion on Module talk:StringFunc#Split back in 2017. Those problems are fixed therefore the test page is not required so delete it. I have no opinions on the other ones. -- PBS (talk) 21:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Module:Video game reviews/testcases I'm good to delete. No comment on the others. You also dropped some module edit requests into the queue about changing to wikitext; was there a reason you did not also TFD those? I think I'd prefer to see those deleted. --Izno (talk) 22:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    These pages contain no actual content, which is why I TfDed them. The pages I edit requested be redirected did contain some content, a pointer to another page, and are therefore out of scope of this TfD (which is already trainwreck-y enough as is). Of course, nothing stops you from RfDing the redirects I requested the creation of yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd say a redirect is about as much content as Module:Location_map/data/Indonesia_Manado/testcases. --Izno (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Module:IPAc-en/testcases speedy per G7 / delete. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 11:05, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't actually remember why I created the testcase pages either, so go ahead. Juxlos (talk) 10:32, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' as unnecessary. --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SHORTDESC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Short description. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 12:50, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:SHORTDESC with Template:Short description.
Should redirect to {{Short description}} - when this is accidentally used, instead of manually setting the SHORTDESC magic word, the {{Short description}} wrapper should be used. That template is preferred over the magic work alone. DannyS712 (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect per nom -- I see nothing to merge here. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect There's general consensus to replace the magic word {{SHORTDESC}} with the wrapper template {{Short description}} for reasons that have been well-rehearsed elsewhere. Since the sole purpose of this template is to catch accidental misuse of the magic word by piping its argument instead of colon-separating it, it might as well point directly to the {{Short description}} template and save a step. --RexxS (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. See also Template talk:SHORTDESC#What does SHORTDESC actually do? and Category:Pages which use a template in place of a magic word (also linked to in the Template_talk discussion) for more context. - dcljr (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Per MOS:ORDER its the first thing an editor sees and it should not be some difficult template name to understand. Change the documentation and say use {{Short description}}. Change the template so it use short description as a wrapper, and put it in Category:Wikipedia templates to be automatically substituted. Christian75 (talk) 09:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - per above. MOS:ORDER has nothing to do with this and seems to be either an editor not understanding this TfD (won't be the first time) or a case of throwing guidelines to see what sticks. Also the few extra characters of "ription" do not make this some difficult template name to understand. --Gonnym (talk) 18:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
comment - MOS:ORDER says short description should be the first thing in the article. SHORTDESC would be the first thing an editor sees. I'm not throwing guidelines. I'm saying I'm against strange portmanteaus in upper case at the very first line in the article. Christian75 (talk) 12:28, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wish I could retire[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 18. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Atlanta Crackers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 18. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_February_10&oldid=1175303313"