Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 28 January 30 >

January 29[edit]

Template:Silmarillion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 07:09, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of the entries except for Ainulindalë redirect to The Silmarillion, so this template does not provide a clear navigational benefit. Hog Farm (talk) 21:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Redirects aren't useful in a navigation template. --Gonnym (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. J947 (c), at 03:14, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userx[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G3:Gibberish. Yunshui 雲水 15:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably test by new user. Template not useful to Wikipedia. David Biddulph (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete CSD G1 - patent nonsense ~~ OxonAlex - talk 15:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

South Africa rugby union tour squads[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 7. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 South Africa President's XV IRB Tbilisi Cup squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 5. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 20:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Complex systems[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:07, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. - || RuleTheWiki || (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Nothing wrong with it. Scope is good and there's no significant overlap with other sidebars. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep; seems a perfectly fine sidebar. Not everything needs a navbox, but this does. J947 (c), at 03:18, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Looks like a perfectly useful sidebar, and this topic is one that would warrant one. Hog Farm (talk) 00:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep; links to related topics, is not a duplicate navbox -- Ham105 (talk) 04:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_January_29&oldid=939538615"