Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 23 September 25 >

September 24[edit]

Template:Infobox NG state[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The states of Nigeria use {{Infobox settlement}} directly. Creator of template had the first edit in article space in 2013 and now has 33: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?target=SundayA.James&namespace=0&tagfilter=&start=&end=&limit=500&title=Special%3AContributions TerraCyprus (talk) 23:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This is documentation for a non-existent template, not an actual usable wrapper. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Mailing list member[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are only 4 pages that use the "inactive" parameter, and 1 page that uses the "blocked" parameter, and User:Yapperbot is approved to remove inactive members from mailing lists. Once you get rid of the rarely-used parameters, you are left with an extremely simple template that has no reason to be implemented in Lua. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I removed the functionality of those two parameters from this module in Special:Diff/977772093 so that if anyone does really care about these parameters, they'll have the next week where they can just revert me to get them back. If nobody cares about those parameters enough to revert me, then I'm fine with deletion. I also updated Template:Mailing list member/sandbox with a non-Lua version. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    You were reverted, but I'm not withdrawing this TfD since I still don't think the template should be bloated with functionality used on only one page, even if one person happens to care about it. * Pppery * it has begun... 11:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 22:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:RenderProfile[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Does it work? Is there another tool we have for debugging module performance? I personally don't give that much regard to performance when writing modules, at least not enough to optimise it, but if this is accurate at showing slow renders, what's the harm? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 22:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Range[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 22:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Hex[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Module:BaseConvert. The only functionality that is used is d2h in Template:R from Unicode character, and I've coded a version using Module:BaseConvert instead in Template:R from Unicode character/sandbox * Pppery * it has begun... 04:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Capital Inicial[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only navigation is between the band article and one album. Is this necessary? Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Two links is not enough for a navbox. BLAIXX 02:11, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Amnesia series[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 October 3. Izno (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_24&oldid=982039148"