Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 19 February 21 >

February 20[edit]

Template:Infobox ride[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Discospinster with the reason "unnecessary and unused infobox" FASTILY 23:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox new[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Discospinster with the reason "unnecessary and unused infobox" FASTILY 23:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ice hockey penalties[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the links on this template go to a specific section of one page (Penalty (ice hockey)), which is not what a navbox is supposed to do. Either this navbox should be deleted or the links should be cut down so that it only contains links to relevant pages on ice hockey penalties (e.g. not just kick). P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Juicy ML[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:05, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by banned user IWasMadeWalker as undisclosed paid editing (later disclosed here) for a promotional page which is currently at AfD here with seven unanimous delete !votes. This nearly deleted article is the only use of this template for a non-notable musician. — Twassman [Talk·Contribs] 21:55, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Injangyang Township[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of red links with no reasonable chance of ever becoming an article. Bot created. Why the whole category can not be deleted is a mystery to me, so I follow the advice of Plasticpork and nominate them separately. The Banner talk 11:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

User:Melab-1/Userboxes/Basic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the title linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 12:07, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

G1 and G2 WP:CSD Huggums537 (talk) 11:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just want to add that I did some further investigation, and found that this user actually creates pretty good userboxes, and this one looks like it might possibly be a personal pattern/test template of some sort, which is why I was confused to see it listed in the userbox gallery, and that is what prompted me to nominate it for deletion, but I might have been hasty since there are a couple of users linking to it, but only one of them appears to be using it properly. Based on this new information, I withdraw my nomination according to the theory that users should be allowed to have test patterns set up in their personal space. Maybe it should be taken down from the gallery, or at least have some documentation saying that it is a base template to work off of. Huggums537 (talk) 11:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archive bottom[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Archive bottom per the previous discussion. Izno (talk) 01:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Archive bottom with Template:Discussion bottom.
See this discussion from last year.

Eventually, I will nominate some more templates, but I am in no rush. {{Discussion bottom}} and {{Archive bottom}} are rather high profile, so they can easily be discussed separately. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 03:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IK Frej squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Club has dropped down to the Swedish sixth tier. No squad list on their website, far below the professional level, not even the manager has a Wiki article. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, not needed & serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 14:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, useless. Nigej (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cmd[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in article space and only one transclusion in project space. JsfasdF252 (talk) 01:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete - I doubt the use of this character will come up regularly enough for a template to be useful. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 22:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_February_20&oldid=1009336786"