Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 22

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 21 February 23 >

February 22[edit]

Template:Tom DeLay series[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was convert to a navbox. No prejudice against a future nomination of the navbox, as some of the participants did not feel it was needed either. Primefac (talk) 10:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar for Tom DeLay. Maybe just about enough to be usable. Nigej (talk) 12:36, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Neutral As template creator Honestly, I'm kinda shocked I made this and never actually added it to the main article. It's decent enough to be added, but I'd like for someone else to say that. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and add to the main Tom DeLay article and the articles listed in the template, making navigation easier for those interested in learning more about DeLay. North America1000 18:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Convert to a navbox or delete. I've looked at the pages this links to. Around 4 are to Tom DeLay, making them unhelpful links. Some are to articles that I can't see a valid reason to have this at the top of the page. Others already have at least one infobox. If this is wanted, it should be a bottom navbox where it takes the least space and duplicate links should be removed. Gonnym (talk) 11:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough for a sidebar. Article sections or redirects are not useful links for navigation. A category for Tom Delay would be better to navigate through articles related to him. I'm going to create the category and update once it's done. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've created the category, there are only six articles, and feels like a small amount for both a navbox or a sidebar. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • convert to a navbox, which won't crowed other right-floating content like images and infoboxes. Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ankara-Sivas HSR[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. ✗plicit 04:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused railway templates with no mainspace for transclusion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination after the event if this template is not sufficiently picked up. Primefac (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep; I don't think there's any harm in leaving it around until it inevitably becomes used. Given that the American Song Contest will probably be a recurring event, it'll become useful just like Template:Esc is now. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments Can't {{Esc}} handle this event too? Also, why does the template contain Cyrillic text? Nigej (talk) 07:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hasn't begun yet and even if it been running for 3 years I would still not see any reason for this template. So WP:CRYSTALL and TOOSOON basically. Gonnym (talk) 09:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I'm definitely biased as the user that created the said template, but I'll state my reasons as to why and adress the raised questions.
I created this template because we know for sure that American Song Contest will happen. A source that doesn't contain the text [[(state) in the American Song Contest]] or [[Participants of the American Song Contest|(state)]] will certainly be more pleasing to the eye of any editor.
I very much disagree that {{Esc}} should be used for this event. It should be kept for the Eurovision family of events only. It's counter-intuitive to use an Esc template for an event that will not be related to Eurovision whatsoever, apart from the genre of the event.
The Cyrilic text had no actual purpose, I'm mostly an editor on sr.wiki so I just kinda brainfarted and forgot what Wikipedia I was on. ImStevan (talk) 13:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Esc currently is also used for Turkvision and the ABU Song Festivals as well, both of which are based on Eurovision but not part of it (just like ASC). Maybe it should be renamed though now that I think about it (and of course keep Template:Esc as a redirect). ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed ImStevan (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:F-15 mounting options[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Said from the creation it was borrowed from the German Wikipedia. Created back in August of 2021 and yet not used anywhere. If still a work in progress, it can be userfyed per the author's request. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Probably not used because its just too detailed to be usable in an encyclopedia. Nigej (talk) 07:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Suk[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing useful as they contain just the flag icons of the United Kingdom and Germany. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Maryland Parkway LRT[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Routemap for an abandoned Light Rail system in Las Vegas. https://lasvegassun.com/news/2019/apr/11/rtc-picks-bus-rapid-transit-over-light-rail-for-ma/ Nigej (talk) 07:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1886 Western Maori by-election[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election table. 1886 Western Maori by-election uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 08:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Content already substituted. Nigej (talk) 08:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021 WNBL Finals Bracket[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bracket. Gonnym (talk) 08:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CSRHP style[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused color templates. Gonnym (talk) 08:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ChoR[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table template. Gonnym (talk) 08:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Highly specific: "Chorale Row (ChoR) for building a table of compositions by Johann Sebastian Bach" Nigej (talk) 08:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dose of ethinylestradiol in birth control pills and risk of venous thromboembolism[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table. Gonnym (talk) 08:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Endogenous estradiol production rates and plasma estrogen levels[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. ✗plicit 04:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table. Gonnym (talk) 08:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Its creator has re-added this to the article, so now used. Gonnym (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Endogenous progesterone production rates and plasma progesterone levels[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. ✗plicit 04:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table. Gonnym (talk) 08:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Its creator has re-added this to the article, so now used. Gonnym (talk) 09:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:F months before now[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused date template. Gonnym (talk) 08:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Famines in The Republic of India[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused famines in India tables. Gonnym (talk) 08:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unused from 2010. Look unfinished. Nigej (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Unused, incomplete — DaxServer (t · c) 17:31, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Formula E Team[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and broken template. Gonnym (talk) 08:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per nom. Unfinished. Nigej (talk) 08:35, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Formula E season[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Pages use {{Motorsport season}}. Gonnym (talk) 08:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete As noted, the template is being bypassed. Nigej (talk) 08:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:&numero[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 4. Primefac (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Collapsible portal box[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused portal template. Gonnym (talk) 09:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Composition bar textless[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fork of Template:Composition bar. Gonnym (talk) 09:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HOSCOTMnew[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science/Collaboration of the Month hasn't been active for around 8 years. Remove usages and delete templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox generation[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 11:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete was used at a few articles like Generation X but has been replaced with a sidebar {{Generations Sidebar}}. A sidebar seems a good idea since they clearly are part of series, and probably an extra infobox would add very little. Nigej (talk) 11:29, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PHL-N[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused road template. Gonnym (talk) 11:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete National road symbol in the Philippines. No longer used. Nigej (talk) 11:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Year nav BC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the pages use Template:Year nav. Gonnym (talk) 11:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both Surplus to the template noted, which can handle BC/BCE dates already. Nigej (talk) 11:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:T-ICU[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A navbox for a subject that does not have an article and which has no related wikilinks. The only links used are general links or external links. Gonnym (talk) 11:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Just totally unsuitable in all respects. Nigej (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LastLeapYear[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:24, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused date table. Gonnym (talk) 13:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete From 2011. Just too obscure to be useful I suppose. Nigej (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kana table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Kana uses different tables. Gonnym (talk) 13:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taxonomy/'''Latridiinae'''[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G7 (non-admin closure) Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Template created at wrong name; see {{Taxonomy/Latridiinae}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taxonomy/"Megophrys"[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Template created at wrong name. See {{Taxonomy/Megophrys}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Template was created at correct name, as quotes on genus name indicate a temporary placement in an existing genus. Template is now in use again: see articles for Dring's horned toad and "Megophrys" feii, both of which are incertae sedis for genus. Loopy30 (talk) 22:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sydney Uni Flames roster[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is article content that exists at 2017–18 Sydney Uni Flames season, the only reasonable place for it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as noted a later version is already being used. Nigej (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WorksDecadeNavEntry[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused category navigation template. Gonnym (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:World War I infobox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This article content has been moved to its parent article. There are previous TFDs that were held when this template was used in World War I, but consensus at that article has apparently shifted, orphaning this template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wild Flowers Worth Knowing[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Unused, uncategorized, undocumented citation template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Check ISSN[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. ISSN templates developed since this template's creation in 2009 have error-checking built in, so this template is no longer needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clt[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete, CSD G7. Superseded by the {{yes}}/{{no}} family of templates. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 21:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Appears to be an abandoned experiment or something that was previously used but has been orphaned. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Communities & Residents/meta/shading and other orphaned political party shading templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Unused political party shading templates replaced by Module:Political party. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. These became unused after the change at Template talk:NZ parlbox#Changing from text on color (shading) to two cell style. Added 2 additional ones that were previously at TfD pre-parlbox change. Gonnym (talk) 16:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inbox Secondary school[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and broken infobox. Gonnym (talk) 17:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox European Union membership[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Texas State Legislature district[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox UE Regulation Details[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox national under-19 cerebral palsy football team[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 17:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:In it[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:41, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to {{In lang|it}} or {{lang|it}}. Gonnym (talk) 17:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:METRO R[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused rail template. Gonnym (talk) 17:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Maharashtra Navnirman Sena/meta/symbol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused political party symbol template with an image which doesn't seem to exist. Gonnym (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Unión Temuco squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Unión Temuco (a football club) folded in 2013, so there is no use for a current squad template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Squad navboxes are only maintained for current teams. Nigej (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, not needed. GiantSnowman 12:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Crafter CMS version[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Removed from the article in which it was used because Crafter CMS does not exist, having been repeatedly deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - it also has 2 CS1 errors. Oculi (talk) 18:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Quotetweet chootrump[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Appears to be article content. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused, but great job to its creator for the layout. Gonnym (talk) 18:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as creator, apologies that it still existed. Feoffer (talk) 08:39, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ring belge[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused rail icon template completely documented in French. Created in 2009. Presumably not needed because other templates do the job. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Actually a road icon, but either way, it's been replaced. Nigej (talk) 19:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SPA/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The parent page is a template disambiguation page, so a doc subpage is not needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Constellations/Polynesian[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 10:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in three articles and has no primary article. Most of the link targets are straight up wrong (19/26 blue links are not related to astronomy, most to birds), and I see some links have even already been unlinked or piped to redlinks to avoid incorrect targets. So, this will likely not help readers with navigation at all. However, more importantly, the list seems to be entirely OR and uncited as I cannot find any canonical source that specifically lists these 42 constellations; the main source for the articles that do exist, http://archive.hokulea.com/ike/hookele/hawaiian_star_lines.html, does not include some such as Hunakai, Pueo, and Palila, and indeed searching for a subset of these together such as "moli" "hunakai" "pueo" "palila" yields nothing relevant (only birds, roads, spam, or things obviously derived from Wikipedia). eviolite (talk) 19:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. It's a fundamental aspect of a navbox that we have some sourced content that it relates to. Without that we have nothing but random links. Polynesian constellation simply redirects to Polynesian culture which makes only a fleeting mention of constellations. Nigej (talk) 19:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Laser Types[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 4. Primefac (talk) 10:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taxonomy/†Kritimys[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, possibly created in error. {{Taxonomy/Kritimys}} gets the job done. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Perhaps a G6. Nigej (talk) 19:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Definitely a G6, as extinct symbol can be added at a separate line within any Kritimys subtaxa.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Film date[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete but, let me know if you would like to have it moved to a module sandbox Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module not obviously intended to be a sandbox. Suggest delete or send to user's Module:Sandbox space. Izno (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:North East railway line/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Not needed, as the parent template uses the standard {{Railway-routemap}} for its documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_22&oldid=1076332131"