Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 June 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< June 15 June 17 >

June 16[edit]

Template:KLRT line symbol[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I merged the code for generating these icons with Module:Adjacent stations/KLRT, so they can be accessed through {{ric|KLRT|...}} and this template is no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 23:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dunkleosteidae[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Redundant to Template:Arthrodira which features the same list of articles. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:13, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Groupement Sportif des Pétroliers sections[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Same number of links already featured on Template:MC Alger. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Requested move/end[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:23, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly redundant with {{RM top}}, which this template is supposed to be used in conjunction with anyway. Its only unique function is the move log links, which could instead be implemented by changing up {{Requested move}} instead to add the move log links of nominated titles. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template creator will not be notified due to him effectively being site banned last year. Other contributors will be notified. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Does not violate any of the WP:TFD#REASONS to delete. I use this template all the time to close move requests. It utilizes {{RM top}}, {{RM bottom}} and more. It's always subst. so its few transclusions won't be seen on its What Links Here page; however, since I placed a self-link in the template, all those closed-request links are shown on that page. I've spent some time improving this template so it can be used, so I would appreciate it if it were not to be deleted. Thank you. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 20:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This template seems to build on / give an alternative to {{RM top}} by providing a visual design similar to {{Requested move/dated}}. I wouldn't consider it redundant, or at least redundant enough to get removed. Aidan9382 (talk) 21:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • When I first found this template over 9 years ago, I was impressed by Rich's clever coding, which I removed as redundant in February 2015. This got me thinking about a possible solution to problems caused by syntax redundancy, when an RM is modified while open, which is the oldest active issue on my bot's talk page (see "relevant January 2013 discussion on my talk"). That's my main reason for keeping the template hanging around; I've never actually used it when closing a requested move. After I realized it needed to be substituted to keep it from breaking after page moves or talk archiving, and not being keen on the amount of code clutter left by substitution, I considered whether it might just be deleted as redundant and unnecessary. Templates like this are designed to be bold and bright, to attract editors' attention to open, active discussions. Perhaps the bold brightness is a bit distracting, making closed discussions compete for attention with open discussions. But, meh, I don't want to upset Paine, who has put a lot of work into tweaking this. – wbm1058 (talk) 18:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 16:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRLW2018Ladder[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Substitute on 2018 NRL Women's season. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Substitute and delete. No reason it cant just go on the article page directly. Makes editing harder for new editors in this format. Aidan9382 (talk) 21:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRLW2020Ladder[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Substitute on 2020 NRL Women's season. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Substitute and delete. No reason it cant just go on the article page directly. Makes editing harder for new editors in this format. Aidan9382 (talk) 21:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DNIPROMETRO-line1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Dnipro Metro. Gonnym (talk) 17:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRLW2021Ladder[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Substitute on 2021 NRL Women's season. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Substitute and delete. No reason it cant just go on the article page directly. Makes editing harder for new editors in this format. Aidan9382 (talk) 21:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:About-distinguish4[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was delete after replacement as discussed. 45.132.253.56 (talk) 13:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:YrMydriay[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G3 by Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:04, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

xwiki vanity spam, useless directional nav template PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:45, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Partisan sources[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 June 25. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:23, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KIEVMETRO-line1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and replaced with Module:Adjacent stations/Kyiv Metro. Gonnym (talk) 07:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KHARKIVMETRO color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Kharkiv Metro. Gonnym (talk) 07:42, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Euskotren Trena style[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Euskotren Trena. Gonnym (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_16&oldid=1094964851"