Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 September 4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 3 September 5 >

September 4[edit]

Template:Workers' Party (Brazil)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep (nomination withdrawn). (non-admin closure) lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみ, ping me when replying 10:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I've added it to the mainspace article. This is a useful navbox. It just needs to be reorganized to be easily read/navigate using. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as the nomination reason (being unused) is now moot. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:07, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn now that there are transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wl[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 12. ✗plicit 11:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tldp[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 12. ✗plicit 11:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TeamBracket-bold[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Based on who the creating editor is, I suspect that this template has been replaced by functionality in a module. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tcw[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:T2a1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sanchez (singer)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox whose item links are all redirects to the main article. No transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Looks redundant at this moment. D4iNa4 (talk) 07:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge the list of singles into the singer's article (or a discography subpage), and then delete. Navboxes should be for navigating between articles, and there are no articles for this to navigate between. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:09, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    As a way of implementing the merge proposed above, I have copied the unsourced list of singles from this navbox to Talk:Sanchez (singer). If sources can be found, the singles can be added to the article. I think that this TFD is ready to close now. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-info[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rugby sevens at the 2022 Commonwealth Games – Men's tournament 5th–8th playoffs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The relevant article uses a module directly and works fine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 18:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as superseded. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Referendum color caption[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pebble Beach Auto Week[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and links to generic articles, not about specific 2009 versions of the linked events. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:P1=x[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Olympic standard[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete: WP:G7 I created this to be used as a weightlifting template but it ended up being unnecessary. TartarTorte 20:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nations at the 2023 Pan American Games[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 11:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No links to articles in the navbox. Delete or userfy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Being used on two articles, and that will expand to 41 in the next few months as the games approach closer. No point in deleting now and creating it soon after. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Too soon. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or userify -- agree there's no point in deleting now and creating again. Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Now nine articles linked on the template. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:National Maccabiah Record[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NATO operation[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Morgan timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

? - - - -T e r g y t h e u s e r- - - - 23:30, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Massviews[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as completely useless. Virtually everyone I've seen who uses massviews as evidence in requested moves discussions just copies the URL directly from their browser and pastes with the default external link markup. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jockey colours[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Itinéraires mégalithiques[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template was used in only one article before it was substed to fix a problem. Not needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Caleb Stanford (talk) 03:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Catholic abbot[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is likely to be redundant to one or more of the infoboxes in Category:Religion and belief infobox templates or its subcategories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Demografia/Lama dei Peligni[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:County demographics[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, or documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Citefrac[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 12:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. It appears that this template was proposed as a workaround for perceived problems with {{fraction}}, but it has not been adopted in the 11 months since its creation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I might have forgotten to put that in some places where it is appropriate. I'm going back now and switching articles that need it. -- Beland (talk) 23:48, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I think I've gotten all of them, or at least all of them found by "insource:/\{\{cite[^\}]+\{\{frac/". -- Beland (talk) 06:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - What is the problem with {{fraction}} that this template avoids? --Sable232 (talk) 14:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It puts some unwanted HTML in the text, which causes errors like "{{cite web}}: templatestyles stripmarker in |title= at position 1". There is some ambition to make the standard templates not do that, but it's yet to actually happen. The discussion was at: Help talk:Citation_Style 1/Archive 80#HTML markup. -- Beland (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep based on the above explanation, but I would strongly recommend that there be some documentation for the template that explains its function. --Sable232 (talk) 21:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cclink[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the previous discussion, it appears that this template was used in one infobox. It is no longer used after this edit by Hike395. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Banaras Hindu University Map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This article content should live at Banaras Hindu University or be deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BC Transit style[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Football in Saba[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The body of this navbox contains no links to articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FFCC-CAT color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Probably replaced by a subpage of Module:Adjacent stations. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FCC LMS letter[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 12. ✗plicit 12:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Circumvesuviana color[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Circumvesuviana. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chelmsford Park and Ride[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:06, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:British J Cup[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No main article. Delete, or merge into {{Revolution Pro Wrestling}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:04, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Best works[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lists only two entries. Caleb Stanford (talk) 16:25, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support deletion – It's the end of the line, it was fun while it lasted. I wonder how long the last two articles will last. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:10TeamBracket-PBA-no3rdplace[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. – Pbrks (t • c) 15:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:10TeamBracket-AustralianFootball[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{10TeamBracket}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 15:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:8TeamBracket QF-standings[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. – Pbrks (t • c) 15:28, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:4TeamBracket-PagePlayoff-Extended[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. – Pbrks (t • c) 14:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bumilangit Cinematic Universe[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only two articles actually exist that belong on this navbox. ★Trekker (talk) 14:08, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:4TeamBracket-RP[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced by various generic brackets of the same format. – Pbrks (t • c) 03:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deletion. Howard the Duck (talk) 04:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Washington Commanders 90 Greatest[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 11. ✗plicit 11:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The 80 Greatest Redskins[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 11. ✗plicit 11:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:6TeamBracket-NPB[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 11. ✗plicit 11:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-AFC[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{16TeamBracket}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 00:07, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_4&oldid=1110262042"