Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 September 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 2
September 4 >

September 3[edit]

Template:WAFLW Sub[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 September 10. Izno (talk) 19:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Intel Data Center GPU Flex series[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template. This appears to be article content, but it has not been used anywhere. Delete; copy/paste into the appropriate article first, if needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was about to incorporate this into multiple article hence the template. That's a common practice for GPUs & CPUs see List of AMD graphics processing units or List of AMD Ryzen processors RM12 (talk) 07:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Template has been used in the intended articles. Templates bring the benefit that errors are corrected in all related articles instead of having mismatching content across different pages. RM12 (talk) 07:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This content is inappropriate anywhere on Wikipedia per WP:NOTDIR. Even if that weren't the case, this use case is typically served by Wikipedia:Labeled section transclusion rather than forking an article out into templates. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:40, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and LST per Pppery. SWinxy (talk) 19:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fijian coups[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only 3 or 4 non-lead entries each; WP:NENAN recommends at least 5 to make a navbox. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:42, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:57, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Template:Lesotho coups and Template:São Toméan coups (four entries); delete remainder (three entries). My personal threshold of utility is a bit lower than the WP:NENAN essay: I don't think two "See also" links is too many for a well-defined topic, but when there are three I start wondering why there isn't just a navbox about it. This is just an opinion, though, without firm policy basis. Folly Mox (talk) 21:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    One of the Sao Tomé and Principe links is a redlink. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all. All of the coups (except for {{Qatari coups}}) are already linked in their respective countries' topics template (e.g. {{Fiji topics}}). Extra navboxes are unnecessary. SWinxy (talk) 19:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Saint-Sylvestre coup d'état[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All four non-header entries are biographies, two of whom are notable for events unrelated to the Saint-Sylvestre coup d'état in the Central African Republic in 1966. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1964 Gabon coup d'état[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All but two of the non-header links are for people and places notable for far more than just the 1964 Gabonese coup d'état. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_3&oldid=1174800272"