Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Boeing 747

Boeing 747[edit]

This is the archived discussion of the TFAR nomination for the article below. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests). Please do not modify this page unless you are renominating the article at TFAR. For renominations, please add {{collapse top|Previous nomination}} to the top of the discussion and {{collapse bottom}} at the bottom, then complete a new nomination underneath. To do this, see the instructions at {{TFAR nom/doc}}.

The result was: not scheduled by Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:11, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Boeing 747-100 of Caribbean Airways.

< The Boeing 747 was a wonderful aircraft of its magnitude and its successful career. It revolutionized aviation travel for everyone. Before, only the wealthy could afford to fly. It was the first superjumbo ever. (Full article...)

Most recent similar article(s): Airbus A380
Main editors: Archtransit
Promoted: February 9, 2008 for Featured Article of Day, December 31, 2007 nomination
Reasons for nomination: it is an important token for aviation history, the first superjumbo ever.
Support as nominator. Bredyhopi (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do not particularly favor the blurb you made for this TFA request. You need to have a detailed summarizing blurb that informs readers what the Boeing 747 is. I also don't think a Featured Article that has already appeared on the main page should reappeared for now with plenty of featured articles that haven't appeared on the main page yet. ₛₒₘₑBₒdyₐₙyBₒdy₀₅ (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the blurb. It is written too much like a joke rather than a summary of the article. Aoba47 (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, Archtransit is a banned editor, master sockpuppeteer; we would need a serious review of this article before re-running it. Please stop this. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - blurb is completely unusable. Bad summary of the article, too short, WP:NPOV issues such as the use of "wonderful". I would recommend that @WP:TFA coordinators probably reject this nomination, as it isn't going anywhere with this blurb. Hog Farm _Talk 02:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]