Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Over There (Fringe)

Over There (Fringe)[edit]

This nomination predates the introduction in April 2014 of article-specific subpages for nominations and has been created from the edit history of Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests.

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the TFAR nomination of the article below. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests). Please do not modify this page unless you are renominating the article at TFAR. For renominations, please add {{collapse top|Previous nomination}} to the top of the discussion and {{collapse bottom}} at the bottom, then complete a new {{TFAR nom}} underneath.

The result was: scheduled for Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 18, 2013 by Bencherlite ^Talk 23:56, 8 January 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

"Over There" is the two-part second-season finale of the Fox science fiction drama series Fringe. Both parts were written by Academy Award-winning screenwriter Akiva Goldsman, together with showrunners Jeff Pinkner and J. H. Wyman. Goldsman also served as director. Fringe's premise is based on the idea of two parallel universes, our own and the Other Side, which began to clash in 1985, after Dr. Walter Bishop (John Noble) stole the parallel universe version of his son, Peter, following his own son's death. The finale's narrative recounts what happens when Peter (Joshua Jackson) is taken back to the Other Side by his real father, dubbed "Walternate" (Noble). FBI agent Olivia Dunham (Anna Torv, pictured) and Walter lead a team of former Cortexiphan test subjects to retrieve him, after discovering that Peter is an unwitting part of Walternate's plans to bring about the destruction of our universe using an ancient doomsday device. Part one aired on May 13, 2010 to an estimated 5.99 million viewers, while part two broadcast a week later to 5.68 million. Both episodes received overwhelmingly positive reviews, with critics lauding the subtle differences between each universe. The finale was selected for multiple 2010 "best of television" lists. (Full article...)

2 points -- Jan 18 will be the series finale of the American science fiction series Fringe, so I thought I'd give it a good send-off (1 pt for date relevance). This article was promoted in July 2011 (1 pt). As far as I can tell, no television episode will have appeared within a month of this date. This is the first time I've nominated an article that I've significantly contributed to, though Caroline of Ansbach ran earlier this year. Ruby 2010/2013 18:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment agree with calculation at 2 points. Toolserver reports two deadlinks, though. Bencherlite ^Talk 19:09, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I found three link issues, which are now all resolved (one citation was removed entirely as the corresponding sentence was backed up by another source). Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 19:29, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose:We just ran a South Park episode; seems like another TV series is not a priority. Nothing personal, just seems like we have something more interesting out there that has more potential points. Montanabw^(talk) 20:46, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concerns. But just looking at the other potential TFAs in January (4 historical biographies, one sports incident, and this), I think this article would actually be adding some diversity. Ruby 2010/2013 21:51, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: I have to agree with Montanabtw; I'd like to think there is a large enough variety of featured content left to make the front page without having two television episodes run within five weeks of each other. Perhaps not...--Chimino (talk) 09:03, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Five weeks is plenty long enough between similar articles; it's well outside the time limit we penalise noms for. This one's in good shape (better than the last one, too) and is a lot less controversial (not that I ever thought cartoon poop was something anyone with half a brain should take offence at). We've also had a very dry run of articles lined up for January (politics, theology, military history, cricket "scandal" and that main page favourite, birds) so it's not like we're crying out for something more highbrow than science fiction. GRAPPLE X 23:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Two Comments - One, to emphasize Ruby's point, the 19th is known as the final episode, period (the show barely eked out a 5th broadcast season due to fan response). Second, I would recommend a bit of trimming on the front page blurb as while the blurb as taken from the lead is fine in conjunction with the article, as a front page bit it focuses a bit too much on the fiction which takes a bit of time to explain for this episode. (As I've worked on this article, I won't comment otherwise on front page support). --MASEM (t) 23:52, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've trimmed the blurb's plot and filled the gap with more on critical responses (it's difficult to cut more since, as you know, the finale's been set-up by the entire series' narrative, as I don't want to confuse casual readers). Thanks for commenting. Ruby 2010/2013 18:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Individual TV episodes seem over-represented. AlexTiefling (talk) 12:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A month is plenty of time. Thought I'd !voted already... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Plenty of diversity. Sceptre ^(talk) 18:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Update Just noting that as of today, no other television articles (or those relating to any form of pop culture) have been scheduled this month (dates up to Jan 14 have been booked). Ruby 2010/2013 19:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]