Wikipedia:Trivia sections/draft2
 | This page in a nutshell: Sections with lists of miscellaneous information (such as "trivia" sections) should be avoided as an article develops. Such information is better presented in an organized way. |
Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous facts. A number of articles contain lists of isolated facts, which are often grouped into their own section, labeled "Trivia", "Notes" (not to be confused with "Notes" sections which store footnotes), "Facts", "Miscellanea", "Other information", etc. This style guideline deals with the way in which these facts are represented in an article, not with whether the information contained within them is actually trivia, or whether trivia belong in Wikipedia. To address the issue of what items should be included or removed, please see Wikipedia's content policies.
In this guideline, the term "trivia section" refers to a section's structure, not its name. A trivia section is one that contains a disorganized and unselective list. However, not all list sections are trivia sections, and a selectively populated list with a narrow theme can be the best way to present some types of information within the article.
Trivia sections[edit]
Trivia sections should be avoided. If they must exist, they should in most cases be considered temporary, until a better method of presentation can be determined. Lists of miscellaneous information can be useful for developing a new article, as they represent an easy way for novice contributors to add information without having to keep in mind article organization or presentation; they can just add a new fact to the list.
However, as articles grow, these lists may become increasingly disorganized and difficult to read, and an exhaustive list of unnecessary details can detract from the goal of presenting a subject in a straightforward and well-organized way. A better way to organize an article is to provide a logical grouping and ordering of facts that gives an integrated presentation, providing context and smooth transitions, whether in text, list, or table.
Guidance[edit]
If items in a trivia section meet the criteria set out in Wikipedia's content policies, then they should be integrated into the article text, in accordance with editing policy. Some facts may belong in existing sections; others can be grouped into a new section of related material (such as "Cameos" or "References in popular culture"). Items that duplicate material already contained elsewhere in the article can be removed in most cases.
It may be necessary to perform research to give each fact some context, and/or to add references. Some entries may be speculative or factually incorrect, and should be removed; some may fall outside the scope of the article and should be moved to other articles; and others, such as "how-to" material or tangential/irrelevant facts, may fall outside Wikipedia's scope and should be removed altogether.
What this guideline is not[edit]
There are a number of pervasive misunderstandings about this guideline and the course of action it suggests:
- This guideline does not suggest removing trivia sections, or moving them to the talk page. If information is otherwise suitable, it is better that it be poorly presented than not presented at all.
- This guideline does not suggest always avoiding lists in favor of prose. Some information is better presented in list format; for guidance, please see Wikipedia:Lists (embedded lists)
- This guideline does not suggest the inclusion or exclusion of any information; it only gives style recommendations. Issues of inclusion are addressed by content policies.
Other policies apply[edit]
Due to the nature of trivia section content in other publications (such as IMDb), it may be important to note that even when trivia sections are present in Wikipedia articles, their content must still be maintained in accordance with Wikipedia's other policies. No section of any Wikipedia article, including trivia sections, should contain speculation, rumor, invented "facts", or libel. An item's degree of potential public interest will not excuse it from being subject to rules like verifiability, neutral point-of-view, or no original research (among others). Also remember that it is always best practice to cite sources when adding new facts to any section, which includes trivia sections.