Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 January 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 26 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 28 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 27[edit]

01:16:27, 27 January 2021 review of submission by Oceanus912[edit]


A big instagram account with posts that have been liked by celebrities should be notable :(

Oceanus912 (talk) 01:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Oceanus912: The applicable guidelines here would be WP:NWEB and WP:GNG. The draft's sourcing does not indicate notability by either of these guidelines (Instagram is not a reliable source). AviationFreak💬 06:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:13:34, 27 January 2021 review of submission by HAshagreY[edit]

I have restructured the article according to wikipedia criteria. I would like it to be reviewed and published. HAshagreY (talk) 03:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HAshagreY, I have to agree with the rejection, every single source appears to be related to the subject or self-published in some way, there is no independent coverage which is required to show that the subject is notable, this would still be declined. Dylsss(talk contribs) 03:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:28:42, 27 January 2021 review of draft by CAOneto[edit]


- A page I submitted for review from my Sandbox was rejected siting "not valid sources." -- If many (most) of the sources linked were Wikipedia pages, what is more 'validating' proof needed than another Wikipedia page {that has been APPROVED!}? This is my 2nd time submitting this page and I've added several links, and so it is getting a bit frustrating. Thank you!

CAOneto (talk) 03:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CAOneto, IMDb and Wikipedia pages are not reliable sources because anyone anyone can edit it, social media is rarely a reliable sources as well because it is self-published, you should also convert embedded links to citations so that it is clear what source is supporting which statements. The article should summarise what reliable sources say to show that the subject is notable. Links to social media, user generated sites, and personal websites do not show notabiltiy on their own. Dylsss(talk contribs) 03:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:52:46, 27 January 2021 review of submission by Chrissy Will[edit]


Hi I've cleaned up and updated this page with more TV and film roles. Chrissy Will (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:14:04, 27 January 2021 review of submission by Chouhan777[edit]


sanju (talk) 06:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. You need sources for each of the article's unreferenced claims. India Forums does not appear to be an acceptable source. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 13:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Chouhan777: Most casting directors seem unlikely to be notable, as they typically work behind the scenes. A person writing an article about a casting director would have to demonstrate that they met the General Notability Guideline, which seems somewhat unlikely for a casting director. That said, you shouldn't be writing about yourself, Sanju. That's not terribly classy, and it's also a conflict of interest. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:08:35, 27 January 2021 review of draft by Giuseppe Ardolino[edit]


Hi, I received the review result (declined) of my draft page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sadas), and I kindly ask for some details on what I need to change, what's part of the text unneutral and references to modify. I previously already asked for feedback (18 January 2021) but I didn't receive it. For any kind of information, I am totally available. Really thanks so much for your availability  Giuseppe Ardolino (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:55:37, 27 January 2021 review of submission by 41.190.31.146[edit]


41.190.31.146 (talk) 11:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:36:57, 27 January 2021 review of submission by Monir1975[edit]

Added below three citation: https://venturebeat.com/2021/01/11/zyter-unveils-smart-hospitals-a-5g-ready-medical-data-and-iot-system/#/ https://www.npr.org/2020/10/13/918315238/more-companies-are-using-technology-to-monitor-for-coronavirus-in-the-workplace https://www.techrepublic.com/article/new-smart-hospital-platform-could-be-the-digital-transformation-tool-healthcare-needs/ So wanted to know above are acceptable in terms of notability? Monir1975 (talk) 14:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:19:02, 27 January 2021 review of submission by Hope samantha[edit]

This article has many neutral sources and has statistic details over a 100+ year old company that is well established. I'm not sure what else I can do to get this published. Please help.

Hope samantha (talk) 19:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


22:12:05, 27 January 2021 review of draft by 174.3.212.76[edit]


I do not know how to reference. 174.3.212.76 (talk) 22:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need someone to fix my draft; Draft: The Secret Of Skinwalker Ranch. please and thankyou. 174.3.212.76 (talk) 22:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken away many links to 1-topic details. I have 2 references. the information is all there; why is this not accepted? 174.3.212.76 (talk) 22:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_January_27&oldid=1004326856"