Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Requests

Please add to the bottom of this list any pages that need to be improved or created. Assessment requests should be made at Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Assessment.

Please review Volatility risk and Volume risk; I've just worked on both. Thanks. Fintor (talk) 08:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warrant (finance): somewhat confusing and overly focused on certain types of warrants. A challenging article to improve as warrants work differently in different markets – will probably require expertise or a lot of research. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
VIX: poorly sourced, confusingly written, and needs more information. This is an important topic and deserves a better article. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CMT Association: Someone recently proposed its deletion which was denied because it's still a notable organization, especially for folks in technical analysis. However, the way it's written needs clean up by 1. Delete uncited material 2. Adding citations 3. Revise non-neutral/advertising language. I would encourage anyone familiar with the designation to help out. Thank you. - Kazuha1029 (talk) 02:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Financial analyst: Please revisit its rating; it's undergone a substantial rework in the last year. Thanks. Fintor (talk) 10:05, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Immunization (Finance): there's a lot of good explanation here, but it contains only one citation. Needs additional citations to improve verifiability. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 10:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental finance Requesting assessment. The article has started as a stub but I have contributed signifacntly and believe it is at least a C class article. Thanks!

Malta Files [fr] --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Dynamic currency conversion should be explained thoroughly by an expert discussing pros and cons in detail from neutral pov.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission lists the five current commissioners. As you can see, only one, the chair, has an article.
- Biographies of Federal agencies are easy to do, because the agency websites have biographies, and other websites have more information about nominees/commissioners. I have done several myself, but right now I am working in other areas, especially Municipal authority (Pennsylvania) connected agencies, such as those shown in List of municipal authorities in Philadelphia. Please consider doing some biographies of these commissioners.
  - Gary Gensler
  - Michael Dunn
  - Jill E. Sommers
  - Bart Chilton
  - Scott D. O'Malia--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trinomial tree - please check: expanded significantly. Thanks. Fintor (talk) 11:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fintor do you still want someone to take a look at this article? Also, is this an assessment request or a content peer review request? A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 12:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to see the history of the carried interest 'loophole'. When was it passed, at least?Craig234

Dividend Equivalent Payments^[1]

That seems to be one not really trivial aspect of the HIRE Act^[1]

(

... or better not really sure to get the right infos as non-expert in this subject and to make matters worse in awareness of my alien English)

It would be nice, if a native speaker & expert could clarify this knowledge gap! (Jaybear (talk) 16:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Financial economics - just "completed" a major re-write. Please review the article, as well revisit its quality-rating. Fintor (talk) 07:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC). Please review changes of last few days. Fintor (talk) 12:59, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the recent expansion of Lattice model (finance). Fintor (talk) 09:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are a number of missing articles related to actuarial science. For example, standard property and casualty reserving techniques such as chain-ladder have no articles and are, in my opinion, notable. -KaJunl (talk) 01:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the recent rewrite of Financial risk management. Thanks. Fintor (talk) 11:16, 23 March 2022 (UTC) (And if appropriate the rating...)[reply]

We need coverage of continuation funds, an investment vehicle of private equite companies in which they sell the vehicle to themselves for profit. One source is FT article. — Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 16:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requests backlog[edit]

Meat and Livestock Australia Hi, I have expanded this article over the past few months and the article has reached a C-class article status. Assessment against the b-class article criteria would be highly appreciated. Thank you! Umbrella.Won (talk) 01:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Net capital rule - This article really needs someone with regulatory knowledge and the expertise to interpret the online news articles covering the post-2004 changes to this topic. I've done some work on the intro (watch for subtle bias throughout), but the rest of the article (and the ghastly footnote section) reads like a lawyer trying to make sense out of a bunch of primary documents.—DMCer™ 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Debt-to-capital ratio - This is a short job, but it's been requesting attention from an expert in the economics portal for ~2 years. It just needs a bit of cleanup (there's talk of including it in Template:Stock market once this happens). Thanks.—DMCer™ 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Put option - I believe the formula listed for calculating the premium paid to the seller of a put contract is flawed completely undermining article.SamISmyth (talk) 06:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Payday loan and Predatory lending - The payday loan article has suffered from back and forth editing from both sides of this issue and could use the expertise of financial editors who can cut through the lobbying/pr/advocate/other noise stuff to get to the encyclopedic tone and sources. I can usually help with sourcing, but please see the article history and Talk:Payday loan. Flowanda | Talk 02:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Currency pair and percentage in point: The currency pair page contains a lot of information on pips, when there is an existing stub on percentage in point. Both pages need work. Finnancier 15:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yield spread, Yield curve spread, TED spread, Mortgage yield, etc. - Foundational concepts about yields and spreads should be explained clearly. But we also need to rethink how these very similar pages are related to one another. Some of them are confusingly similar. Finnancier (talk) 15:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Effective interest rate, annual percentage rate and annual percentage yield - relationship between the three need to be clarified Finnancier (talk) 11:50, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please suggest improvements to systemic risk. Nshuks7 (talk) 09:27, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bond option#Valuation & Bond option#Embedded options. Please check my wording: potentially unclear - put formulae into words. Thx. Fintor (talk) 07:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sovys / Sovereign yield spread futures. I've created a redirect to CME but I think an article could make sense... however they're so shite that it's hardly important! Egg Centric 08:59, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Regulation S-K: I just copyedited this, and there are a number of areas needing attention - most especially making sure I didn't introduce any errors by misunderstanding the frequently-unclear material that was there earlier! Allens (talk | contribs) 19:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Parts of the table in List of circulating currencies are pure nonsense in their present form. Please see the Talk page there. --Thnidu (talk) 06:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
S&P Leveraged Loan Index is badly outdated. it descibes some "current" index values as indicative of economic distress — and the references date back 5+ years. Could give an uninformed reader erroneous view of current economy. —2606:A000:678C:9300:39CC:5504:29F9:5DFD (talk) 23:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^ ^a ^b http://www.kattenlaw.com/New-Rules-for-US-Withholding-on-Dividend-Equivalent-Payments

[DEP-01-1] ttp://www.kattenlaw.com/New-Rules-for-US-Withholding-on-Dividend-Equivalent-Payments

[1]