Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre/Recruiter Central/Archives/Sssssss340

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Status: In progress

Date Started: 3 January 2014

Date Ended:

Recruiter: Royroydeb

Step One[edit]

You first go through WP:Good article criteria and WP:What the Good article criteria are not , then I will proceed.RRD13 (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the two pages sssssss340 05:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Step Two[edit]

Now, I will be taking a quiz. You need to score at 80% to pass.

  1. What does "broad in coverage means" ?
  2. Can an article be failed only because it is not well illustrated?
  3. What do you mean by "original research" ?
  4. When we can strip off an article of its GA position?
  5. Suppose in an article (regarding a person), vital information which defames the person is missing.Can that article be a GA?If not why?
  6. What does "stable" mean?RRD13 (talk) 08:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Here are my answers:

  1. A article is broad in coverage if it only provides the necessary information, no more, no less
  2. No, illustrations are not required if there are none readily available. However, illustrations can greatly improve most articles and should be added if there are illustrations readily available.
  3. Research not verifiable by a reliable published source
  4. At any point at which it no longer represents the level of quality that is expected of a good article.
  5. No, the article must provide all information to maintain a neutral stance.
  6. There should not be a active Editing War or content dispute, however vandalism, proposals, and copy edits are not qualifiers for instability.

sssssss340 02:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Ok! Its correct.
  2. Yes!
  3. Yes!
  4. Partially true. It is when someone seeks a reassesment of the article or the article becomes a Featured Article.
  5. Very Good!
  6. Correct

You have given 5 correct answers so you percentage is 84%. Congratulations! You have passed the test.

Step Three[edit]

Now how we can continue is entirely upto you. Firstly I would like to ask you if you have any doubts in anywhere, then you are welcomed to ask me. After that take a nomination at here and I will supervise how you do. RRD13 (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the nomination at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAS_(software) sssssss340 12:53, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Once you keep put on your reviews, User:sssssss340, keep the article on hold for 7 days. If nothing satisfactory occurs during the time period then prematurely fail the article. RRD13 (talk) 04:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Good_articles/Recruitment_Centre/Recruiter_Central/Archives/Sssssss340&oldid=602420546"