Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Review/Peer review/Prairie Avenue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prairie Avenue[edit]

This article failed at WP:FAC (see here) although it had few outstanding actionable changes requested. It has been at WP:PR (see here) for over three weeks with nothing but automated comments. Even the automated peer review (see here) had almost no comments. It could use some assistance toward a successful WP:FAC.TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 15:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review by Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs)
It needs more images. Get two more and it'll be great. The "Today" section needs expansion, and the "History" section could use some too. Apart from that, it's a great article.--Phoenix-wiki 15:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added two more modern pictures. I will look for some others.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 21:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added several more older images.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 22:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, well, that looks better. What about exanding those sections? I'm fairly confident it'll gain featured status once those have been expanded.--Phoenix-wiki 22:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
After pushing this through WP:GAC and one attempt at WP:FAC, I have pretty much exhausted my resorces in terms of expansion except for going back to the same set of limited resources and adding less important stuff. Unless other editors get interested, I will have to hope the additional images make the difference. Looking at the last FAC discussion, might I interest you in a copyedit.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 05:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I might have time to do a copyedit later today. As for expanding, I know nothing about the street, though you might want to look at Category:Wikipedians in Chicago — one of them might be able to help you.--Phoenix-wiki 11:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Grabbed a few things off Wikipedia:Lists of common misspellings and searched your article fro them. I didn't find anything wrong.--Phoenix-wiki 16:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The last FAC said it needed independent review or copy editing. If you get a chance to take a closer look, it would be appreciated.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 05:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]