Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Yugoslav submarine Nebojša

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted by TomStar81 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 03:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Yugoslav submarine Nebojša[edit]

Nominator(s): Peacemaker67 (crack... thump)

Yugoslav submarine Nebojša (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Most of the Yugoslav Navy was captured intact in port during the April 1941 invasion, but Nebojša escaped and joined the Royal Navy, and was returned to the Yugoslavs after the war. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Image is appropriately licensed. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:32, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SupportComments: G'day, I made a couple of minor tweaks and have the following suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I see a mixture of British English and American English spellings. For example "draught" (British) and "maneuvers" (US)
  • "sister ship of the Hrabri-class Hrabri" (this looks a little clunky). I wonder if you couldn't just say "sister ship Hrabri"
  • I wonder if it should be mentioned that the electric motors were for use while submerged? AustralianRupert (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support
    • Really not much to find fault with, looks good to me.
    • "She served with the British 2nd Submarine Flotilla in 1942 and the British 3rd Submarine Flotilla in 1943,[1] and she continued serving in the Mediterranean until the end of the war..." The prose is just a little repetitive (specifically "serve" and "serving"). Consider perhaps something like: "She served with the British 2nd Submarine Flotilla in 1942 and the British 3rd Submarine Flotilla in 1943,[1] and continued working in the Mediterranean until the end of the war..." (minor nitpick, suggestion only) Anotherclown (talk) 08:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank (push to talk)

  • "Her surfaced displacement was 975 long tons (991 t) (1,164 long tons (1,183 t) submerged),": MOS recommends against nested round brackets/parentheses, and against ")(" (I think). Stick an "or" after the first ")".
  • I've replaced "subsequently" (but not subsequent) by "later" and "then". If something else was meant, please fix it. - Dank (push to talk) 01:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on prose per standard disclaimer. These are my edits. - Dank (push to talk) 01:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, Dan. Have addressed the nesting. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 09:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.