Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Wines task force/Top Level Importance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following articles have been assigned Top Level Importance in the Wikipedia:Wine Project article assessment program.

TOP IMPORTANCE ARTICLES[edit]

  1. Support Charleenmerced Talk 20:34, 3 March 2007
  2. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 07:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Gotox 23:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support --Christopher Tanner, CCC 06:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)tanner-christopher[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 6 April 2007

  1. Support Top 10 Global wine region Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Andrew Dalby 14:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support §ĉҺɑʀκs 01:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Major wine region AgneCheese/Wine 20:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 26 February 2007

  1. Support Major wine region and world recognize style. AgneCheese/Wine 20:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support Major wine region and world recognize style. AgneCheese/Wine 20:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support --Charleenmerced Talk 06:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced. This is an imp grape and should be top importance.[reply]
  2. Support I admit to a Hungarian bias: even though I work in another region, noble rot is responsible for the world fame of Tokaji. varbal 22:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Christopher Tanner, CCC 07:30, 22 March 2007 Very important to Bordeaux blending
  5. Support Camw 02:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 23 March 2007

  1. Support One of the "Big 6" Grapes - The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support AgneCheese/Wine 07:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support since I am proposing it Andrew Dalby 13:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Steve.Moulding 13:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Charleenmerced Talk 05:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  5. Support AgneCheese/Wine 20:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 5 March 2007

  1. Support Major wine region and world recognize style. AgneCheese/Wine 20:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support One of the "Big 6" Grapes - The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support AgneCheese/Wine 07:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support Probably the most recognized Italian wine. - The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support Charleenmerced Talk 05:45, 28 February 2007
  2. Support mikaul 14:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support AgneCheese/Wine 20:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Gotox 23:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 28 March 2007

  1. Support Gotox 23:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support scharks 12:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support--Charleenmerced Talk 15:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  4. Support mikaul 22:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support FlagSteward 00:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 3 April 2007

  1. Support since I am proposing it (because there's so much beyond Bordeaux, Burgundy and Champagne; but the current article needs expansion) Andrew Dalby 13:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Steve.Moulding 13:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support AgneCheese/Wine 20:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Charleenmerced Talk 05:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  6. Support Symposiarch 09:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 28 February 2007

  1. Support Major wine region and world recognize style. AgneCheese/Wine 20:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Andrew Dalby 14:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support Charleenmerced Talk 20:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  2. Support §ĉҺɑʀκs 01:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 14:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Christopher Tanner, CCC 07:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)tanner-christopher[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 22 March 2007

  1. Support Major wine region and world recognize style. AgneCheese/Wine 20:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Andrew Dalby 14:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support One of the "Big 6" Grapes - The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support AgneCheese/Wine 07:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support Charleenmerced Talk 20:32, 3 March 2007
  2. Support AgneCheese/Wine 20:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Christopher Tanner, CCC 07:30, 22 March 2007
  5. Support Camw 02:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 23 March 2007

  1. Support One of the "Big 6" Grapes - The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support AgneCheese/Wine 07:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support One of the Big 6 noble grapes. AgneCheese/Wine 20:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support Charleenmerced Talk 20:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  2. Support numero uno DO española mikaul 14:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support AgneCheese/Wine 20:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Gsherry 01:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Gotox 23:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 28 March 2007

  1. Support --Charleenmerced Talk 06:17, 6 March 2007 Another imp grape.
  2. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Christopher Tanner, CCC 07:30, 22 March 2007
  4. Support Camw 02:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support mikaul 07:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 28 March 2007

  1. Support One of the "Big 6" Grapes - The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support AgneCheese/Wine 07:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support Charleenmerced Talk 20:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  2. Support §ĉҺɑʀκs 01:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 14:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support AgneCheese/Wine 20:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 20 March 2007

  1. Support Gotox 23:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support--Charleenmerced Talk 15:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 22:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support FlagSteward 00:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support --Christopher Tanner, CCC 06:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)tanner-christopher[reply]
  6. Support--Symposiarch 10:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 6 April 2007

  1. Support conditional on improved article - the third-biggest world producer really does deserve a better page! mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Top 5 wine producer Steve.Moulding 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Andrew Dalby 19:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Symposiarch 17:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support AgneCheese/Wine 20:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 28 February 2007

  1. Support. I think useful to differentiate this as there are a lot of great non-Champagne sparklings out there. Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Andrew Dalby 14:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support §ĉҺɑʀκs 01:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 18 February 2007

  1. Support --Charleenmerced Talk 06:17, 6 March 2007
  2. Support--mikaul 19:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Christopher Tanner, CCC 07:30, 22 March 2007
  5. Support Gotox 23:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 28 March 2007

  1. Support Gotox 23:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support--Charleenmerced Talk 15:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 22:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support --Christopher Tanner, CCC 06:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)tanner-christopher[reply]
  5. Support--Symposiarch 10:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 6 April 2007

  1. Support The motherland of all wine articles. This one should be a priority. AgneCheese/Wine 20:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support The Bethling(Talk) 01:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 16 February 2007

  1. Support Understanding wine should include at least a basic how it's made Steve.Moulding 03:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Andrew Dalby 14:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support mikaul 18:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support §ĉҺɑʀκs 01:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 18 February 2007

  1. Support --Charleenmerced Talk 06:17, 6 March 2007 very imp.
  2. Support Bduke 21:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. SupportChristopher Tanner, CCC 07:30, 22 March 2007
  4. Support mikaul 07:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Gotox 00:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PASSED Top Importance 29 March 2007

  1. Support--FlagSteward 16:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support--BodegasAmbite 21:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose -Amatulic 22:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support--Symposiarch 19:19, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support--Tomas e 09:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support -- AgneCheese/Wine 00:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support scharks 12:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support--Charleenmerced Talk 15:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]
  3. Support mikaul 22:05, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support --Christopher Tanner, CCC 17:06, 21 April 2007 (UTC)tanner-christopher[reply]
  5. Support--Symposiarch 10:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support -Amatulic 22:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAILED NOMINATIONS[edit]

Comment. Maybe noble rot would be a better nom? --Limegreen 03:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Noble Rot is a specific applied use of a specific form of botrytis. Both are interesting topics, but they aren't interchangeable.--mroconnell 11:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Andrew Dalby 14:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support --mroconnell 11:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support I admit to a Hungarian bias: even though I work in another region, noble rot is responsible for the world fame of Tokaji. varbal 22:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose. Interesting articles that do contribute a depth of knowledge (thus High Importance), but not absolute must-haves for a print-encyclopedia. -- Steve.Moulding 21:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose in part. This should be a top level article for a project other than the Wine Project. Although it relates to wine, it is not of top importance for our purposes so I suggest it be classified as mid level. Charleenmerced Talk 21:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced[reply]

FAILED High Importance 13 March 2007

  1. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAILED High Importance 3 March 2007

  1. Support Symposiarch 08:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FAILED High Importance 3 March 2007