Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots

This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. This is part of a defunct wikiproject to redesign the layout of wikiprojects themselves. The material here probably accurately describes legacy code where it is still in use, but is not instructional material for what to do with extant wikiprojects. It was last substantively updated 16 July 2015‎.

Volunteer your WikiProject for pilot testing! We will notify the project's talk page if it has been selected for pilot testing.

For a full list of WikiProjects using or experimenting with the WikiProject X UI see: Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Dashboard.

Sign up!

Sign-up list[edit]

For WP:WikiConnect AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure how much time I can devote to testing and implementation, but I started the following projects and am curious to see if any new ideas or tools could be helpful: Grammy Awards task force (for WikiProject Awards and prizes), Oregon Arts Project, Wiki Loves Pride (2014), WikiProject Björk, WikiProject Cannabis, WikiProject Rufus Wainwright. Needless to say, most of these projects were created years ago and are pretty inactive at the moment, or used predominantly for my own note taking. Feel free to use them to test new concepts, if it helps. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Jainismis struggling for new articles, it has now became very less active and has a very slow progress.#BOTFIGHTER (talk) 09:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiproject Ghana has been struggling to stay active for awhile, any engagement or activity here might interest project members greatly.—Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 15:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
#Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft STJMLCC (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC) & STJMLCC (talk)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject G.I. Joe could use some new blood, as it is basically just me at this point. I also recently helped create a couple new film task forces that would welcome new members! Fortdj33 (talk) 17:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WikiProject Disability needs to attract new participants, many of the early members have become inactive resulting in a noticable slowing of activity. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guatemala and Wikipedia:WikiProject Mesoamerica could use anything that might help generate more interest. Simon Burchell (talk) 17:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Cosmology. It is a month old project that still needs improvements Tetra quark ^{(don't be shy)} 17:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Food and drink would benefit from revitalization through the acquisition of more active members. The project's main page and subpages underwent a major layout overhaul in September 2013 which significantly improved the project's organization, so improvement in this area is not necessary. The main concern is a lack of active members. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam and Wikipedia:WikiProject Buddhism, along with maybe Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion and Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity and child projects are all projects with a [expletive deleted]-load of articles and comparatively few editors to maintain them. Any help would be greatly appreciated. John Carter (talk) 19:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States presidential elections is need of new members, as activity has declined in recent years. The project, which seemed to generate a high level of enthusiasm in its early stages, has now become only semi-active.--JayJasper (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sanitation is new and tiny so far, am curious to see what tools there might be. Am right now struggeling to get the table to work properly that lists the articles by relevance and quality which we have tagged so far. EvM-Susana (talk) 21:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Signing myself and Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Trek up for this. I'd be eager to draw more editors into this realm. Miyagawa (talk) 19:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling is in need of new members who want to regularly contribute towards the generation of rider and team articles, as well as pages detailing races. XyZAn (talk) 17:29, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Adding WikiProject Beetles on behalf of User:Gug01. Harej (talk) 01:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Signing myself and Wikipedia:WikiProject Lede Improvement Team up. It's a new project and I'm always interested in new tools and gadgetry. Discant X 11:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools, a large project with over 300 registered participants but of whom less than a handful are actually active in any way on school articles. Project coordinator: Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Worcestershire. A small project, but more active than it actually looks. Creator & coordinator: Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Latin music, activity has been fluctuating since last year. We're still a relatively young project (it moved from being a task force to a project in mid 2012) compared to other projects that deals with different music genres. I'd like to add WikiProject Pop music as well since it's a newer project that could use the attention as well. Erick (talk) 03:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't mind access to some new tools both to try to revive some projects that run the gambit from "flagging of late" to "just plain mummified", including WP:WikiProject Biology, WP:WikiProject Physiology, WP:WikiProject Psychology, WP:WikiProject Dance, WP:WikiProject Linguistics,WP:WikiProject Human rights, WP:WikiProject Evolution, WP:WikiProject Nonviolence, WP:WikiProject Cognitive science; even WP:WikiProject Science hasn't seen much activity in the last little while. Don't mean to jumpstart all of them on my lonesome, but mass mailer privileges would be useful in particular for these cases, to try to assist coordinators in these spaces (where they aren't MIA themselves) to establish a census of (and generate some baseline discussion between) those editors who are signed up for the project at present. I might also shop said tools around to (relatively) more robust WP:WikiProject Animals, WP:WikiProject History, and WP:WikiProject Tree of Life as well. I'm not sure if those are amongst the tools being referenced here, but if not, I may as well apply through the normal process for those privileges and just keep X appraised of my luck with them. Snow talk 12:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas seems to have enough interest, but not so much activity. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 01:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm interested in trying out new tools for WikiProject Open Access and other science-related WikiProjects on enwiki, on other Wikipedias or on other Wikimedia projects (most notably on Commons, Wikisource and Wikidata). -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. I am curious to see the new tools and layouts. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:43, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TAFI logo

WikiProject Today's articles for improvement (WP:TAFI) needs help with bot coordination to better-organize content processing (per previous, ongoing talk page discussions, such as archiving the project's nominations to various pages and moving content from and to various pages, etc.). The project would also benefit from more participation. This project had a brief run as a Main page entry circa late April 2013 to late May 2013 (e.g. see this archived talk page discussion) and has potential to become a project that many contribute to, particularly is it were to be reinstated on the Main page, which would keep inertia, participation and interest in the project going. It was removed from Main page due to a processing error that occurred (e.g. see the archived talk page discussions Bot discussion and the discussion following the entry being pulled here). The initial error was quickly resolved through the use of a bot, but we couldn't get it back on Main page after the error at the time. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision. Have had some haphazard approaches in recent years and confusions over what Wikipedia is all about. Project reform has been sought in the past. A revamp of project space recently has shown positive support and ease of access for its members. Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 00:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Lucknow. Interested in adding new members in the project who want to help and are passionate about the city or a new place entirely. Wikiboy2364 (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Women writers. The project is almost 6 months old. We'd like to expand our active membership and we're open to trying new things. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Romania and Wikipedia:WikiProject Wine could use some engagement Meşteşugarul - U 10:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Streetcars Aneditor (talk tome) 03:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Hampshire - always up for trying something new, and could definitely do with more active members. Waggers TALK 09:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Like many other WikiProjects, the Guild of Copy Editors has a lot of folks on its mailing list but alarmingly few warm bodies. Since what we try to do is important to the overall quality of the 'pedia, any guidance would be very welcome. Thanks and all the best, Miniapolis 01:59, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels Sadads (talk) 02:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Wikiproject Cross-language Editing and Learning Exchange. This is a new project designed for people writing in a second language. It needs help getting the word out to potential members, including those who might only be active on non-English Wikipedias. Tdslk (talk) 21:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Notability Would love to see this revived, we have almost 60,000 articles tagged with unclear notability. With more members, organization and cooperation I'm sure we could reduce this backlog. JayJay^{What did I do?} 19:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Romance A new project (started end of May 2015) which could be a good test of launching a new project without having to retrofit
Wikipedia:WikiProject Socialism, Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia, Wikipedia:WikiProject Soviet Union, Wikipedia:WikiProject China, Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa, Wikipedia:WikiProject Iraq, Wikipedia:WikiProject Syria, Wikipedia:WikiProject Ukraine, Wikipedia:WikiProject Norway, Wikipedia:WikiProject Sweden... --TIAYN (talk) 09:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Tech Ambassadors samtar^{(leave me a message)} 17:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
# Wikipedia:WikiProject Home Living The project is getting less and less active; however, it is a really important WikiProject. Daylen (talk) 03:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject California, Wikipedia:WikiProject Arizona and Wikipedia:WikiProject San Diego. I wish it was better to be an important project. JJ98 (Talk) 07:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:GLAM/Pritzker would like to try the new tools for WikiProjects. Many of the active participants are library interns. TeriEmbrey (talk) 20:17, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport Hmlarson (talk) 00:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube The project was recently revived, needs help for more interest. As of 22:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC) there are only four members. This project is trying to create and maintain YouTube-related articles. Jamesjpk (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I created Wikipedia:WikiProject Parenting today. I'd like the join config to be created but I can't do it myself because I don't have interface rights. See MediaWiki talk:Gadget-formWizard/WikiProject Parenting/Join Thanks! Mvolz (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Transhumanism would be great for beta testing the new tools. Mahalo, ー「宜しく」 クロノカム 10:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Villages Previously defunct, but I am willing to save it. Nathan (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Free and open-source software task force can use an updated interface. As the WikiProject X prototypes are free and open-source software, the FOSS task force would welcome the prototypes and gladly contribute to new features. — Newslinger talk 11:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Mount Juliet, Tennessee could use layout changes to appeal to more users. mrwoogi010 ^Talk 15:41, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Marshall Islands could use some appearance changes to not look like a pile of bulleted text. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 02:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Portals is all about new tech, and would be interested in participating. — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 18:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/American politics would greatly appreciate any help provided. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability has a wide scope, and would make good use of tools that streamline editor recruitment. — Newslinger talk 17:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Connecticut –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Socialism again. Started working on it here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Socialism/sandbox, but I'm not sure how to enable Reports bot. --MarioGom (talk) 20:47, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProjects Killershark20:24, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
20:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)~

Wikipedia:WikiProject The Simpsons Needs a reboot and new tools. AmericanAir88^(talk) 06:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]