Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Kalamazoo College/Manga, Anime, and Gender in Modern Japan (Fall 2017)
| This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contact |
 | This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- Manga, Anime, and Gender in Modern Japan
- Institution
- Kalamazoo College
- Instructor
- Noriko Sugimori
- Wikipedia Expert
- Shalor (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- Manga, Anime, and Gender
- Course dates
- 2017-09-11 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-11-17 23:59:59 UTC
- Approximate number of student editors
- 20
| Student | Assigned | Reviewing |
|---|---|---|
| K15gg02 | The Promised Neverland | |
| Xiiiu | ||
| Wangbbella | ||
| Andy3067 | ||
| FShojiramos | Steins;Gate (anime) | |
| K15ny01 | Xam'd: Lost Memories | |
| K17nn02 |
Timeline
Week 1
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 11 September 2017 | Wednesday, 13 September 2017 | Friday, 15 September 2017
- In class - Wikipedia essentials
- Overview of the course
- Introduction to how Wikipedia will be used in the course
- Understanding Wikipedia as a community, we'll discuss its expectations and etiquette.
Handout: Editing Wikipedia
- Assignment - Learn the basics
- Begin the training modules assigned for your course. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.
- Assignment - Critique an article
- Review pages 4-7 of the Evaluating Wikipedia brochure. This will give you a good, brief overview of what to look for in other articles, and what other people will look for in your own.
- Evaluate an existing Wikipedia article related to the class, and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's talk page.
- A few questions to consider (don't feel limited to these):
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
Resources: Evaluating Wikipedia, [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Using_talk_pages.pdf Using Talk Pages
]
Week 2
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 18 September 2017 | Wednesday, 20 September 2017 | Friday, 22 September 2017
- Assignment - Add to an article
- Add 1–2 sentences of new information, backed up with a citation to an appropriate source, to a Wikipedia article related to the class.
- Assignment - Copyedit an article
- Choose one article, identify ways in which you can improve and correct its language and grammar, and make the appropriate changes. (You do not need to alter the article's content.)