Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Mount Allison University/Personality (Winter 2018)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Personality
Institution
Mount Allison University
Instructor
Jonathan Wilbiks
Wikipedia Expert
Ian (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Personality
Course dates
2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-04-17 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
80


Students will choose a non-existent or inadequate article related to personality and improve it.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Jocelyne.perry Personality crisis Panic attack
Kerenam Mood (psychology)
Cyanpatterson Self-esteem
Bail2 Psychosomatic Medicine Extraversion and introversion
Ecpleshka Behavioral epigenetics Masking (personality)
Emmaaconrad Type A and B personality theory Nature vs Nuture
Kadunnett Masking (personality) Behavioral epigenetics
Luke Fleming98
Heyemmab Mental disorders diagnosed in childhood Nature versus nurture
Aaquinn
Apaicanada Habit, Effortfulness
Nicolebristol
Jmrollins Negative affectivity Nature versus nurture
Adam firlotte Personality Dark triad
Amberarlene OCPD [[1]], [[2]],
Aljohnson111
Halliemaceachern Nature versus nurture Big Five Personality Traits
ST719 Psychopathy
Kataylor2 Shared delusional disorder Gray's biopsychological theory of personality
Kkleclairemazerolle Gray's biopsychological theory of personality
Patrice Pagulayan Happy Slapping
Mnwashington Type A and Type B personality theory Borderline Personality Disorder
Snpatrick Big Five Personality Traits Nature versus nurture
Therealmarkpyne Near Death Experiences [[3]], [[4]], [[5]]
Gabrielchristiem Positive Psychology
Pharrell24 Psychoticism Sport
Eccrowe Trait theory Microexpression
Jmphillip Four temperaments Murray's system of needs
Gnrhiro Heritability of Personality Bullying and Personality Characteristics
Sakorhalkar Anal stage
Bethpallen Self-defeating personality disorder Murray's system of needs
Bolinli1 Ego psychology Comfort zone
Phaedrus101 Behavioural and Learning Theories of Personality Personality crisis
Abbiemackenzie Employment testing Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
Zdpyo1 Persona
Bailey.oregan15 Cheating
Justinedowns Murray's system of needs Self-defeating Personality Disorder
QI LI Personality traits and use of social media Self-esteem
Hvburns Type D personality Type A and B personality theory
HannahJRose Situationism (psychology) Perfectionism (psychology)
Scoy16 Self-concept Mood (psychology)
Dabyrne123 Antisocial personality disorder Histrionic Personality Disorder
Eccordy Personal Attributes Questionnaire Type D personality
Cdchamandy Extraversion and Introversion Psychosomatic Medicine
Jergal18 Perfectionism (psychology)
Lshay Dependent personality disorder
Randyoconnor Comfort zone
Johnbriand Addictive personality
Tjlegallais Eysenck's theory of personality
MichaelMalek Dark triad Effortfulness
Majames5 Myers–Briggs Type Indicator Employment testing
IanCarty Risk-seeking Dependent personality disorder
Rjbamber Panic Attack Perfectionism (psychology)
AnthonyLee121 Histrionic Personality Disorder Antisocial Personality Disorder
Kbsearspayzant
Graham.kelly Self-Reference Effect Self-Reference Effect
Jared.Adams
Jeffrey Pearson Psyche
Amcampbell2 Borderline Personality Disorder, Personality Type A and Type B personality
Lkernizan HEXACO
TrustTheProcess42 Conscientiousness
Spark5 Dependent personality disorder Eysenck's theory of personality
Rlbritt79 Microexpression Trait theory
Ccarefoote
Rgholland
Nmottar Trait theory Gray's biopsychological theory of personality
Mabuckle Personality Type D personality
Kayla haddad17 Bullying and Personality Characteristics
Laurenbourgeois Sensation Seeking Other Traits Linked to Sensation Seeking
MaxChaps Life satisfaction Psyche

Timeline

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 22 January 2018   |   Wednesday, 24 January 2018   |   Friday, 26 January 2018
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 4

Course meetings
Monday, 29 January 2018   |   Wednesday, 31 January 2018   |   Friday, 2 February 2018
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
  • Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    • Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    • Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  • Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~~~~.
In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 5 February 2018   |   Wednesday, 7 February 2018   |   Friday, 9 February 2018
Assignment - Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  • The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 12 February 2018   |   Wednesday, 14 February 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?
Assignment - Review the rules for medical topics

Review Wikipedia's rules for topics related to medicine, human health, and psychology.

Assignment - Choose possible topics
  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Look up 3-5 potential topics related to the course that you might want to update on Wikipedia. Review the content of the article and check the Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Identify one or two areas from each that you could improve.
  • Choose 2-3 potential articles from that list that you can tackle, and post links to the articles and your notes about what you might improve in your sandbox.
  • Finally, present your choices to your instructor for feedback.

Week 7

Course meetings
Monday, 26 February 2018   |   Wednesday, 28 February 2018   |   Friday, 2 March 2018
Assignment - Finalize your topic / Find your sources
  • On the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.
Guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area

Psychology

Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 8

Course meetings
Monday, 5 March 2018   |   Wednesday, 7 March 2018   |   Friday, 9 March 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.
Assignment - Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  • Select a classmate’s article that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign it to yourself to review.
  • Peer review your classmate's draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians.
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 9

Course meetings
Monday, 12 March 2018   |   Wednesday, 14 March 2018   |   Friday, 16 March 2018
Assignment - Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

Week 10

Course meetings
Monday, 19 March 2018   |   Wednesday, 21 March 2018   |   Friday, 23 March 2018
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.
Assignment - Polish your work

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 11

Course meetings
Monday, 26 March 2018   |   Wednesday, 28 March 2018
Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!

Week 12

Course meetings
Monday, 2 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 4 April 2018   |   Friday, 6 April 2018
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.