Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Tennessee Knoxville/INSC 350 The Information Consumer (Fall 2017)
| This Course
|
Wikipedia Resources
|
Connect
Questions? Ask us:
contact |
 | This course page is an automatically-updated version of the main course page at dashboard.wikiedu.org. Please do not edit this page directly; any changes will be overwritten the next time the main course page gets updated. |
- Course name
- INSC 350 The Information Consumer
- Institution
- University of Tennessee Knoxville
- Instructor
- Amanda Click
- Wikipedia Expert
- Shalor (Wiki Ed)
- Subject
- Information Science
- Course dates
- 2017-08-23 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-12-08 23:59:59 UTC
- Approximate number of student editors
- 23
Emphasizes the impact of the Information Age on society and the everyday lives of individuals, in the contexts of worklife, health, finance, and social interaction. Covers information literacy skills and personal information management techniques to cope effectively with information overload, disinformation, propaganda, and fraud. Concepts include seeking, evaluating and communicating information, creation of information, information ethics and access, privacy and security, digital citizenship, personal information management, and the economics of information.
| Student | Assigned | Reviewing |
|---|---|---|
| Kristywaka | ||
| Zafheaton | ||
| Mzajac1 | ||
| Jhadley2 | ||
| Mrobbi18 | ||
| KatherineWhitehead | ||
| Kbranno1 | ||
| Egraves7 | ||
| Tblevin3 | ||
| Ksmit245 | ||
| Csalvemi | ||
| Hkeil | ||
| Klong209 | ||
| Jrodger8 | ||
| Northway0808 | ||
| Egranju |
Timeline
Week 1
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 4 September 2017 | Friday, 8 September 2017
- Introduction to the Wikipedia project
Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.
Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.
Week 2
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 11 September 2017 | Friday, 15 September 2017
- Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
To get started, please review the following handouts:
Editing Wikipedia pages 1–5
- Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
- It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
- When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.
Week 3
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 18 September 2017 | Friday, 22 September 2017
- Assignment - Evaluate a Wikipedia article
It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.
- Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
- Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
- Choose an article on Wikipedia related to either INSC 350 or your major to read and evaluate. I recommend that you DO NOT select an article designated as "Good" or "Featured." The best articles aren't generally the most interesting to evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
- Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Check 3-5 citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
- Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Egranju (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC).
Week 4
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 25 September 2017 | Friday, 29 September 2017
- Assignment - Add to an article
Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:
- Add 1-2 sentences to an article related to INSC 350 or your major, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
- The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement.
Week 5
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 2 October 2017
Week 6
- Course meetings
-
- Monday, 9 October 2017 | Friday, 13 October 2017
- Assignment - Reflection
Write a reflective essay (500 words) on your Wikipedia contributions.
Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:
- Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
- Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
- Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
- Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?