Wikipedia talk:Database reports/Cross-namespace redirects

To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, please start new conversations at Wikipedia talk:Database reports.

Redirects of the form CAT:Foo[edit]

I wasn't aware that redirects from CAT:Foo to Category:Foo were cross-namespace. There's a LOT of those. JPG-GR (talk) 05:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if we remove all with WP:, P: and CAT, that would help. Banak (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sort order?[edit]

Is there any? Could we sort by page creation date? –xeno^talk 15:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's currently no specified sort order. Page creation date of which title? --MZMcBride (talk) 03:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of the redirect... Newest first, I guess? –xeno^talk 04:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A column for redirect creation date would also be nice. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 05:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@MZMcBride:, any chance of the above enhancement, and a refresh? ;-) If not, I will build my own. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 01:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Red links[edit]

Could this report be changed so that it displays deleted redirects as wikilinks (red links) but displays non-deleted links ones with "&redirect=no" please (in the same way it was done at Wikipedia_talk:Database_reports/Orphaned_talk_pages#Change - using {{plnr}})? (and also the other Redirect reports if they don't do this already). Thanks Mhiji 18:08, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to edit {{rlw}} and {{plnr}} to your heart's content. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce the number of entries per page[edit]

The pages of this report all end up in Category:Pages with too many expensive parser function calls. I think that we need to reduce the number of entries per page here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]