Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Seasons of Lost

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconTelevision: Lost Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the Lost task force.

Working definition[edit]

"Seasons of Lost" contains articles for each season of the show, Lost - rst20xx (talk) 01:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vital improvements[edit]

Lost (season 4) while need to be promoted to GA-class by 2008-08-29 three months since the finale aired.

No problem. Three months seems almost too generous and I expect it to be an FLC by mid-June. –thedemonhog talkedits 17:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I was wrong, but we probably will have it at FLC in the next two weeks. –thedemonhog talkedits 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This topic now fails criteria 1.d. and 3.c., as Lost (season 5) needs to be audited for quality and added to the topic. The topic has 3 months from the date of creation of that article, or until 2008-10-26, to re-meet the criterion.

Additionally, the topic will have three months from the airing of the season 5 season finale to get Lost (season 5) to GA/FA, or the topic will fail criterion 3.b. - rst20xx (talk) 22:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potential improvements[edit]

None - rst20xx (talk) 01:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update.  ;) –thedemonhog talkedits 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible additions[edit]

  • Lost: Missing Pieces could be added immediately - rst20xx (talk) 01:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I think that this would be more appropriate in a main Lost topic. –thedemonhog talkedits 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • I think it would work in both, in many ways it's effectively a mini-series of Lost and I'm sure you wouldn't have any problems getting it included if you decide you want to add it. But it's up to you! rst20xx (talk) 14:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • If articles were of sufficient standard for each episode, this topic could be expanded to an "Episodes of..." topic - rst20xx (talk) 01:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This has been our goal. So far, ten of twelve fourth season episode articles are good or featured. –thedemonhog talkedits 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This topic could be expanded into a general Lost topic, with the addition of Lost (TV series) and its subarticles - rst20xx (talk) 01:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Again, too many holes. Only four out of fourteen are good are featured. –thedemonhog talkedits 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • A sister "Characters of..." topic could be made - rst20xx (talk) 01:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not for a while, as only four of thirty-three plus articles are of good status. –thedemonhog talkedits 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • And similarly, ones for the cast and crew could potentially be made in the distant future - rst20xx (talk) 17:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note, that I've recently started to work on Lost credited cast members becoming GAs (or FAs), and I've created a Lost cast members list wich I plan to get up to FL status in order to get it up to a Featured Topic. If anybody wants to help, feel free to do so. --Music26/11 17:10, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
See this page if your interested. --Music26/11 18:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All articles...[edit]

...are not featured. Obviously, the multi-star icon is inappropriate. I'm not sure how to remove it, thought, the template wasn't very clear. Teh Rote (talk) 13:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As season 5 is not in a permanent state (i.e. it will either become featured soon, or the whole topic will be demoted), the template is correct - rst20xx (talk) 14:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]