Wikipedia talk:Good article reassessment/Hillary Rodham Clinton/3
Question[edit]
Why is GA Sweeps (a process initiated in 2007) considering an article which has received two reassessments since then? Geometry guy 09:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- GA Sweeps is ongoing and incomplete. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps worklist if you would like to help.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 12:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I understand this, but the GA Sweeps list consists of articles which were listed as GA prior to 26 August 2007, and the Sweeps mission is to ensure that they have all received an up-to-date reassessment. Since this article has been reassessed twice since 26 August 2007, it already meets that criterion. Reassessing it again does not represent best use of our limited reviewing resources. Geometry guy 20:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- It was on the list of articles to be reassessed. It has not been reassessed in a year and there are reasons to consider its rating. I am not going to close the review because it was reviewed a year ago. It is up for review based on merit and not the calendar.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, that is fine. Any editor can bring any article for reassessment at any time. Geometry guy 20:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- It was on the list of articles to be reassessed. It has not been reassessed in a year and there are reasons to consider its rating. I am not going to close the review because it was reviewed a year ago. It is up for review based on merit and not the calendar.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I understand this, but the GA Sweeps list consists of articles which were listed as GA prior to 26 August 2007, and the Sweeps mission is to ensure that they have all received an up-to-date reassessment. Since this article has been reassessed twice since 26 August 2007, it already meets that criterion. Reassessing it again does not represent best use of our limited reviewing resources. Geometry guy 20:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)