Wikipedia talk:Professional opinion-havers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEssays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Title[edit]

Hate to say it, but you've got too many hyphens – should be simply Wikipedia:Professional opinion-havers. It's the difference between a professional haver of opinions and a haver of professional opinions. (There are some hyphen–endash issues here as well, but they need not detain us.) EEng 00:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Fair enough. GMGtalk 01:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just my professional opinion, of course. EEng 07:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done GMGtalk 14:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, for whatever it's worth "you are wrong" I believe is an Army-ism. As in "If you are not in formation you are wrong. Unfuck your soup sandwich or beat your face until you do." Translated: You should be in formation now. If you are not, then you should do so immediately or you should do push ups. GMGtalk 14:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - I don't have an opinion on this essay yet, but I want to leave this comment here just to let everyone know that I will have an opinion soon, so be on the lookout for it. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfO[edit]

  • Should we have opinions on having opinions?

Survey[edit]

  • Ambivalent - I like how meta it is, but it might be too meta. GMGtalk 15:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]