Wikipedia talk:Vagueness

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconEssays High‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
HighThis page has been rated as High-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Regulation Change[edit]

The regulations have changed and the content of the page is invalid. EME requirements has changed. RS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.180.236 (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell us your conserns
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:8303:af20:1c1c:8d71:609b:e5f6 (talk) 03:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?[edit]

It appears that this essay covers the same scope as MOS:WTW, to which this page should probably be merged with. 2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:951E:9D9A:F168:AF9F (talk) 03:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support; merge into #Expressions that lack precision in the corresponding article --Firestar464 (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing unclear[edit]

These are subjective qualifications. So be more clear as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koitus~nlwiki (talkcontribs) 23:57, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Vague now redirects here[edit]

Wikipedia:Vague and WP:Vague now redirect here (to WP:Vagueness). I submitted it on Wikipedia:How to make a redirect

Massmediazealot (talk) 08:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @2600:1700:A2A0:FB50:951E:9D9A:F168:AF9F and @Firestar464 above that these articles overlap and should be merged.

I will add "See also: Wikipedia:Please clarify and Wikipedia:Vagueness" to:

Massmediazealot (talk) 09:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]